-
REGULATIONS
Vol. 31 Iss. 21 - June 15, 2015TITLE 9. ENVIRONMENTSTATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARDChapter 40Fast-Track RegulationTitles of Regulations: 9VAC5-20. General Provisions (Rev. C14) (amending 9VAC5-20-21).
9VAC5-40. Existing Stationary Sources (Rev. C14) (amending 9VAC5-40-5220, 9VAC5-40-5270).
Statutory Authority: § 10.1-1308 of the Code of Virginia; §§ 110, 111, 123, 129, 171, 172, and 182 of the Clean Air Act; 40 CFR Parts 51 and 60.
Public Hearing Information: No public hearings are scheduled.
Public Comment Deadline: July 15, 2015.
Effective Date: July 30, 2015.
Agency Contact: Karen G. Sabasteanski, Department of Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street, P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 698-4426, FAX (804) 698-4510, TTY (804) 698-4021, or email karen.sabasteanski@deq.virginia.gov.
Basis: Section 10.1-1308 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Air Pollution Control Board to promulgate regulations abating, controlling, and prohibiting air pollution to protect public health and welfare.
Federal Requirements: Sections 109 (a) and (b) of the federal Clean Air Act (Act) require the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to prescribe primary and secondary air quality standards to protect public health and welfare for each air pollutant for which air quality criteria were issued before the enactment of the 1970 Act. These standards are known as the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Among the NAAQS specified by EPA under 40 CFR Part 50, ozone and its precursors (nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds) are included.
Section 110(a) of the Act mandates that each state adopt and submit to EPA a state implementation plan (SIP) which provides for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each primary and secondary air quality standard within each air quality control region in the state. The plan must establish enforceable emission limitations and other control measures as necessary to comply with the provisions of the Act, establish schedules for compliance, prohibit emissions that would contribute to nonattainment of the standards or interfere with maintenance of the standards by any state, and require sources of air pollution to install, maintain, and replace monitoring equipment as necessary and to report periodically on emissions-related data.
Part D of the Act specifies state implementation plan requirements for nonattainment areas, with Subpart 1 covering nonattainment areas in general and Subpart 2 covering additional provisions for ozone nonattainment areas. Ozone nonattainment areas are further classified, depending on the severity of their ozone pollution problem, as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme, with correspondingly more stringent requirements imposed as the classification level increases.
Section 172(a) of the Act authorizes EPA to classify nonattainment areas for the purpose of assigning attainment dates. Section 172(b) of the Act authorizes EPA to establish schedules for the submission of plans designed to achieve attainment by the specified dates. Section 172(c) of the Act specifies the provisions to be included in each attainment plan, including the implementation of all reasonably available control measures as expeditiously as practicable.
Part D, Subpart 2, § 182(a)(2)(A) of the Act requires that the existing regulatory program requiring reasonably available control technology (RACT) for stationary sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in marginal nonattainment areas be corrected by May 15, 1991, to meet the minimum requirements in existence prior to the enactment of the 1990 amendments. RACT is the lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility. EPA has published control technology guidelines (CTGs) for various types of sources, thereby defining the minimum acceptable control measure or RACT for a particular source type.
Section 182(b) of the Act requires stationary sources in moderate nonattainment areas to comply with the requirements for sources in marginal nonattainment areas. The additional, more comprehensive control measures in § 182(b)(2)(A) require that each category of VOC sources employ RACT if the source is covered by a CTG document issued between enactment of the 1990 amendments and the attainment date for the nonattainment area. Section 182(b)(2)(B) requires that existing stationary sources emitting VOCs for which a CTG existed prior to adoption of the 1990 amendments also employ RACT. Section 182(b)(3) requires the implementation of Stage II vapor recovery in ozone nonattainment and maintenance areas.
As required by § 182(b)(3) of the Act, all gasoline dispensing facilities in moderate or worse nonattainment areas with a gasoline throughput of more than 10,000 gallons per month must install Stage II vapor recovery systems to prevent gasoline vapors from escaping to the atmosphere during motor vehicle fueling.
Section 182(b)(3) of the Act also allows for an exemption for independent small business marketers of gasoline that sell less than 50,000 gallons per month. An independent small business marketer of gasoline is a person engaged in the marketing of gasoline that would be required to pay for procurement and installation of Stage II vapor recovery equipment under § 324 of the Act; this definition does not apply if the marketer is a refiner or is affiliated with a refiner. Section 324 contains additional specific provisions relating to Stage II vapor recovery for small business marketers (independents) of gasoline. According to § 324(a) of the Act, independently owned facilities with a gasoline throughput of 50,000 gallons per month or more are allowed an extended three-year phase-in period for installation of Stage II vapor recovery systems. Section 324(a) reiterates the exemption for independently owned facilities with a throughput of less than 50,000 gallons per month; however, § 324(b) of the Act states that nothing in § 324 can prohibit any state from adopting or enforcing a Stage II regulation for independents having monthly sales of less than 50,000 gallons per month.
As required by § 182(b)(3)(B) of the Act, the compliance date for installing Stage II vapor recovery systems for gasoline dispensing facilities built after the effective date of the state's Stage II regulation is six months after that regulation's effective date. Facilities that dispense 100,000 gallons of gasoline or more per month are required to install Stage II vapor recovery systems no later than one year after the effective date of the state's regulation. All other gasoline dispensing facilities must be in compliance no later than two years after the effective date of the state's Stage II regulation.
Section 182(c) of the Act requires that program requirements for moderate nonattainment areas be applicable in serious nonattainment areas.
Section 184 of the Act establishes the Ozone Transport Region (OTR), which includes several northeast states and portions of northern Virginia, and imposes additional ozone control requirements specific to the region.
Section 202(a)(6) of the Act provides that after the regulation requiring onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) systems for new vehicles is adopted by EPA, Stage II controls will no longer be required in moderate nonattainment areas, and Stage II controls may be waived for serious, severe, and extreme nonattainment areas when the EPA Administrator determines that onboard controls are in widespread use throughout the U.S. motor vehicle fleet.
These provisions of the Act are implemented through federal regulations at 40 CFR Part 51, which sets out general requirements for the preparation, adoption, and submittal of SIPs. Other than what is specified in the Act, there are no specific regulatory requirements governing Stage II vapor recovery programs; the details of such programs were left to the states.
Beginning with model year 1998, ORVR equipment has been phased in for new vehicles, and has been a required control on nearly all new highway vehicles since 2006. Over time, non-ORVR vehicles will continue to be replaced with ORVR vehicles. Stage II and ORVR emission control systems are redundant, and EPA has determined that emission reductions from ORVR are essentially equal to and will soon surpass the emission reductions achieved by Stage II alone. On May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28772), EPA eliminated the largely redundant Stage II requirement in order to ensure that refueling vapor control regulations are beneficial without being unnecessarily burdensome to American business. This action allows, but does not require, states to discontinue Stage II vapor recovery programs.
State Requirements: Section 10.1-1300 of the Code of Virginia defines pollution as "the presence in the outdoor atmosphere of one or more substances which are or may be harmful or injurious to human health, welfare or safety, to animal or plant life, or to property, or which unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment by the people of life or property." Excess emissions from petroleum liquid storage and transfer operations are harmful to human health and can significantly interfere with the people's enjoyment of life and property.
Section 10.1-1307 A of the Code of Virginia provides that the board may, among other activities, develop a comprehensive program for the study, abatement, and control of all sources of air pollution in the Commonwealth.
Section 10.1-1308 of the Code of Virginia provides that the board shall have the power to promulgate regulations abating, controlling, and prohibiting air pollution throughout or in any part of the Commonwealth in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act.
Purpose: The purpose of this action is to amend the Emission Standards for Petroleum Liquid Storage and Transfer Operations regulation for volatile organic compounds such that Stage II vapor recovery systems are no longer required in the Northern Virginia Ozone Transport Region, and will not be required in the Richmond ozone maintenance area beginning on January 1, 2017. The amendments protect the health, safety, or welfare of citizens of the Commonwealth by removing requirements that have been determined to no longer be necessary to protect the environment, resulting in costs savings for affected business owners. Also, the general public will enjoy greater air quality protection, as the incompatibility between Stage II and ORVR will be eliminated.
Emissions of VOCs from the refueling of motor vehicles are controlled in two ways: Stage II fuel pumps and ORVR systems that are directly integrated into an individual motor vehicle.
Gasoline dispensing facilities store fuel in underground storage tanks (USTs), which is then dispensed to individual vehicle fuel tanks. As a vehicle tank fills, the liquid gasoline displaces a commensurate amount of vapor that contains air and VOCs. Stage II vapor recovery, which is integrated into the gasoline pumping mechanism, captures the displaced vapor and returns it to the UST, where it either condenses to liquid form or is removed and transported to the fuel terminal by tanker refueling trucks. Fuel terminals vent the vapors to either a vapor combustion system, where the vapors are destroyed via oxidation, or a vapor recovery system, where the vapors are captured and regenerated as a liquid via carbon bed technology.
ORVR is a system found in gasoline-powered motor vehicles to capture gasoline vapors displaced from the vehicle fuel tank when it is being refueled. An onboard vapor recovery system consists of an activated carbon canister that captures the displaced vapor during refueling. A portion of the engine intake air then regenerates the carbon, and the hydrocarbons burn as fuel in the engine. Federal regulations now require on-board vapor recovery on all gasoline-powered passenger cars, light trucks, and complete heavy trucks of less than 14,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating.
Stage II and ORVR do not always work together properly. When refueling an ORVR-equipped vehicle with a vacuum assist-type Stage II equipped dispenser, compatibility problems may result in an increase in emissions from the UST vent pipe and other system fugitive emissions. In an ORVR-equipped vehicle, the liquid seal in the fill pipe blocks the vapor flow from the vehicle fuel tank, and fresh air drawn into the UST enhances gasoline evaporation in the UST. This additional evaporation increases pressure in the UST, and as tank pressure exceeds the rating of the pressure/vacuum valve, the valve allows vapor to escape. Balance-type and certain vacuum assist-type Stage II dispensers are compatible with ORVR and do not cause these excess emissions.
EPA recognizes this incompatibility problem, and the Clean Air Act has always contemplated Stage II becoming superseded by ORVR in some circumstances--hence EPA's determination of widespread use and waiver of the Stage II requirement.
Two Virginia areas have been subject to Stage II requirements: the Richmond ozone maintenance area, and the Northern Virginia ozone nonattainment area (which generally corresponds to the Ozone Transport Region). The department examined whether Stage II is still necessary for ozone control purposes and has determined that Stage II is no longer needed in these areas' attainment and maintenance plans, which are approved into the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP). The department has also determined that ORVR will be in widespread use in the Richmond area by January 1, 2017, and became in widespread use in Northern Virginia OTR as of January 1, 2014. Because Stage II is no longer needed for the control of ozone in these areas, Virginia submitted amendments to effect its removal from the SIP on November 12, 2013 (for Richmond), and on March 19, 2014 (for Northern Virginia). These SIP revisions satisfy all Clean Air Act and EPA requirements regarding the removal of Stage II vapor recovery system requirements. Virginia's specific Stage II requirements are found in Article 37 of 9VAC5-40, and must now be amended accordingly.
Rationale for Using Fast-Track Process: In compliance with the federal Clean Air Act and EPA guidance, the department undertook an analysis to determine whether Stage II controls were needed in order to attain and maintain the ozone NAAQS; the results of this analysis demonstrated that the removal of Stage II will not have an impact on ozone emissions and is therefore no longer needed. The department then developed appropriate amendments to the SIP, which underwent public comment for federal SIP purposes. No comments were received from the public, and EPA actively supports the removal of this program as appropriate from SIPs. As discussed in greater detail elsewhere, the removal of Stage II controls is expected to have a positive economic and public health impact. Because a cost benefit will be realized at no expense of air quality, it is not expected that this action will be controversial.
Substance: Stage II will no longer be mandatory in the Northern Virginia ozone nonattainment area because ORVR has been in widespread use as of January 1, 2014. Stage II will no longer be mandatory in the Richmond ozone maintenance area as of January 1, 2017, as that is the date when ORVR will be in widespread use. Facilities decommissioning their Stage II equipment are required to meet certain decommissioning requirements in order to protect Stage I controls, and facilities that elect to continue to use Stage II must continue to operate and maintain the Stage II equipment properly.
Issues: The general public will enjoy greater air quality protection, as the incompatibility between Stage II and ORVR will be eliminated. Gasoline dispensing facilities will benefit from no longer having to install and maintain unnecessary pollution control equipment. The manufacturers of Stage II equipment and other ancillary Stage II installation and maintenance businesses will not see a negative impact even though there will no longer be a market for these devices in Virginia because they are selling replacement equipment and maintenance services and providing maintenance services through the transition period as facilities decommission. There are no disadvantages to the public.
The department will no longer need to inspect gasoline dispensing facilities to ensure the proper installation and operation of Stage II equipment. This will enable department compliance staff to direct resources to facilities that have more of a direct impact on air pollution and public health. There are no disadvantages to the department or the Commonwealth.
Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:
Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The proposed changes will no longer require gas stations in Northern Virginia (effective immediately) and Richmond (effective January 1, 2017) ozone nonattainment areas to employ Stage II vapor recovery systems.
Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for all proposed changes.
Estimated Economic Impact. The proposed changes will no longer require gas stations in Northern Virginia (effective immediately) and Richmond (effective January 1, 2017) ozone nonattainment areas to employ Stage II vapor recovery systems. A Stage II system is made of special nozzles and hoses that capture vapors from the vehicle's fuel tank during refueling process and route them to an underground storage tank (UST). Simply put, the system replaces the volume of dispensed gas in UST with the commensurate amount of incoming vapors from the vehicles gas tank preventing emission of the vapors into the atmosphere.
The proposed change is prompted by the determination of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that the onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) system is in widespread use throughout the country. In an ORVR system, the gas tank and the fill pipe are designed so that when refueling the vehicle, fuel vapors in the gas tank travel to an activated carbon packed canister, which absorbs the vapor. When the engine is in operation, the system feeds vapors into the engine intake manifold to be used as fuel.
Both Stage II and ORVR try to accomplish the same goal. However, they do not always work together properly. When refueling an ORVR-equipped vehicle with a vacuum assist-type Stage II equipped dispenser, compatibility problems may result in an increase in emissions from the UST vent pipe and other system fugitive emissions. In an ORVR-equipped vehicle, the liquid seal in the fill pipe blocks the vapor flow from the vehicle fuel tank, and fresh air drawn into the UST enhances gasoline evaporation in the UST. This additional evaporation increases pressure in the UST, and as tank pressure exceeds the rating of the pressure/vacuum valve, the valve allows vapor to escape. According to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), EPA recognizes this incompatibility problem, and the Clean Air Act has always contemplated Stage II becoming superseded by ORVR in some circumstances; hence, EPA's determination of widespread use and waiver of the Stage II requirement.
Two Virginia areas have been subject to Stage II requirements: the Richmond ozone maintenance area, and the northern Virginia ozone nonattainment area. DEQ examined whether Stage II is still necessary for ozone control purposes and has determined that ORVR will be in widespread use in the Richmond area by January 1, 2017, and became in widespread use in northern Virginia/OTR as of January 1, 2014. Because Stage II is no longer needed for the control of ozone in these areas, Virginia submitted amendments to effect its removal from the state implementation plan (SIP). These SIP revisions satisfy all Clean Air Act and EPA requirements regarding the removal of Stage II vapor recovery system requirements.
The determination of widespread use is critical. In the absence of a Stage II system, older vehicles not equipped with ORVR will cause emissions of vapors during the refueling process. On the other hand, newer vehicles equipped with ORVR will not cause emissions of vapors during the refueling process due to elimination of the incompatibility of the two systems. If ORVR system is in widespread use, avoidance of vapor emissions from newer cars would balance out or exceed the emissions of vapors from older vehicles. Thus, the determination of widespread use of ORVR implies that elimination of Stage II system would reduce or would not increase emissions of vapors at the aggregate during the refueling process. If a reduction in emissions of gasoline vapor is achieved, it would reduce ozone pollution and would be environmentally beneficial for the Commonwealth.
The proposed change will eliminate installation and maintenance costs associated with Stage II systems for future gas stations that would have otherwise been required to install a Stage II vapor recovery system.
In addition, approximately 1,174 gasoline stations currently in Richmond and northern Virginia areas will no longer have to incur maintenance costs for their Stage II systems if they choose to decommission their system. While decommissioning of Stage II would present a one-time expense to the gas stations, they would no longer incur ongoing maintenance costs. EPA estimates that removal of Stage II systems will produce $333 savings per gas station in the first year, $1,323 in the second year, $2,316 in the third year, and $2,973 per year in the longer term.1
Since the use of ORVR is already determined to be widespread in northern Virginia, 681 gas stations will start realizing savings immediately after the proposed changes go in effect. These savings are estimated to be cumulatively $227,000 in the first year after the proposed change becomes effective, $901,323 in the second year, $1.5 million the third year, and $2 million every year thereafter. The use of ORVR will be widespread in 2017 in Richmond area. Thus, 493 gas stations in Richmond area will start realizing cumulatively $164,133 savings in 2017, $652,500 savings in 2018, $1.1 million savings in 2019, and $1.4 million savings annually thereafter based on EPA's cost estimates.
Additional administrative cost savings are also expected. DEQ expects $92,980 savings annually after implementation based on the assumptions that a routine Stage II inspection takes approximately 2 hours to conduct, inspectors are paid approximately $39.60 per hour, and there are 1,174 gas stations affected. Similarly, gas stations will likely experience some administrative cost savings associated with no longer having Stage II system inspections conducted by DEQ.
Businesses and Entities Affected. The proposed change will no longer require approximately 681 gasoline stations in the northern Virginia ozone nonattainment area effective immediately and 493 gas stations in the Richmond ozone maintenance area effective January 1, 2017, to operate a Stage II vapor recovery system.
Localities Particularly Affected. The portions of the Richmond ozone maintenance area subject to Stage II are the counties of Charles City, Chesterfield, Henrico, and Hanover and the cities of Colonial Heights, Hopewell, and Richmond; Prince George County and Petersburg City are exempt from Stage II. The northern Virginia ozone nonattainment area consists of the counties of Stafford, Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William, and the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and Manassas Park.
Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed change will likely create some demand for labor to decommission Stage II vapor recovery system in the first few years while reducing demand for labor to install new Stage II systems that would have otherwise been taking place. In the longer term, the proposed change should reduce demand for labor associated with maintenance of Stage II systems.
Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed change will provide savings to gas station owners and should have a positive impact on their asset values. However, a reduction in demand for Stage II systems is expected. A reduction in demand for these systems would have a negative revenue impact on their manufacturers, distributors, and installers.
Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. Most if not all of the affected 1,174 gas stations are believed to be small businesses. The costs and other effects on them are the same as discussed above. Similarly, some of the manufacturers, distributors, and installers of Stage II systems may be small businesses and may experience a reduction in their revenues.
Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact. There is no known alternative that minimize the adverse impact while accomplishing the same goals.
Real Estate Development Costs. No longer requiring a Stage II vapor recovery system, may make it easier for entrepreneurs to start a gas station business and may promote development of real estate for that purpose.
Legal Mandate. General: The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order Number 17 (2014). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the report should include but not be limited to:
• the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulation would apply,
• the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected,
• the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected,
• the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and
• the impact on the use and value of private property.
Small Businesses: If the proposed regulation will have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include:
• an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation,
• the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents,
• a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and
• a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation.
Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules is notified at the time the proposed regulation is submitted to the Virginia Register of Regulations for publication. This analysis shall represent DPB's best estimate for the purposes of public review and comment on the proposed regulation.
_____________________________________
1Federal Register/Vol. 77, No.95/Page 28772/May 16, 2012.
Agency's Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the economic impact analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget and has no comment.
Summary:
Under the proposed amendments, gas stations in Northern Virginia (effective immediately) and Richmond (effective January 1, 2017) ozone nonattainment areas will no longer be required to employ Stage II vapor recovery systems.
9VAC5-20-21. Documents incorporated by reference.
A. The Administrative Process Act and Virginia Register Act provide that state regulations may incorporate documents by reference. Throughout these regulations, documents of the types specified below have been incorporated by reference.
1. United States Code.
2. Code of Virginia.
3. Code of Federal Regulations.
4. Federal Register.
5. Technical and scientific reference documents.
Additional information on key federal regulations and nonstatutory documents incorporated by reference and their availability may be found in subsection E of this section.
B. Any reference in these regulations to any provision of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) shall be considered as the adoption by reference of that provision. The specific version of the provision adopted by reference shall be that contained in the CFR
(2013)(2014) in effect July 1,20132014. In making reference to the Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Part 35 means Part 35 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations; 40 CFR 35.20 means § 35.20 in Part 35 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.C. Failure to include in this section any document referenced in the regulations shall not invalidate the applicability of the referenced document.
D. Copies of materials incorporated by reference in this section may be examined by the public at the central office of the Department of Environmental Quality, Eighth Floor, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. of each business day.
E. Information on federal regulations and nonstatutory documents incorporated by reference and their availability may be found below in this subsection.
1. Code of Federal Regulations.
a. The provisions specified below from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) are incorporated herein by reference.
(1) 40 CFR Part 50 -- National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(a) Appendix A-1 -- Reference Measurement Principle and Calibration Procedure for the Measurement of Sulfur Dioxide in the Atmosphere (Ultraviolet Fluorescence Method).
(b) Appendix A-2 -- Reference Method for the Determination of Sulfur Dioxide in the Atmosphere (Pararosaniline Method).
(c) Appendix B -- Reference Method for the Determination of Suspended Particulate Matter in the Atmosphere (High-Volume Method).
(d) Appendix C -- Measurement Principle and Calibration Procedure for the Continuous Measurement of Carbon Monoxide in the Atmosphere (Non-Dispersive Infrared Photometry).
(e) Appendix D -- Measurement Principle and Calibration Procedure for the Measurement of Ozone in the Atmosphere.
(f) Appendix E -- Reserved.
(g) Appendix F -- Measurement Principle and Calibration Procedure for the Measurement of Nitrogen Dioxide in the Atmosphere (Gas Phase Chemiluminescence).
(h) Appendix G -- Reference Method for the Determination of Lead in Suspended Particulate Matter Collected from Ambient Air.
(i) Appendix H -- Interpretation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone.
(j) Appendix I -- Interpretation of the 8-Hour Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone.
(k) Appendix J -- Reference Method for the Determination of Particulate Matter as PM10 in the Atmosphere.
(l) Appendix K -- Interpretation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter.
(m) Appendix L -- Reference Method for the Determination of Fine Particulate Matter as PM2.5 in the Atmosphere.
(n) Appendix M -- Reserved.
(o) Appendix N -- Interpretation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM2.5.
(p) Appendix O -- Reference Method for the Determination of Coarse Particulate Matter as PM in the Atmosphere.
(q) Appendix P -- Interpretation of the Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone.
(r) Appendix Q -- Reference Method for the Determination of Lead in Suspended Particulate Matter as PM10 Collected from Ambient Air.
(s) Appendix R -- Interpretation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead.
(t) Appendix S -- Interpretation of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen (Nitrogen Dioxide).
(u) Appendix T -- Interpretation of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Sulfur (Sulfur Dioxide).
(2) 40 CFR Part 51 -- Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans.
(a) Appendix M -- Recommended Test Methods for State Implementation Plans.
(b) Appendix S -- Emission Offset Interpretive Ruling.
(c) Appendix W -- Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised).
(d) Appendix Y -- Guidelines for BART Determinations Under the Regional Haze Rule.
(3) 40 CFR Part 55 -- Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations.
(4) 40 CFR Part 58 -- Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
Appendix A -- Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs and PSD Air Monitoring.
(5) 40 CFR Part 59 -- National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer and Commercial Products.
(a) Subpart C -- National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products.
(b) Subpart D -- National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings, Appendix A -- Determination of Volatile Matter Content of Methacrylate Multicomponent Coatings Used as Traffic Marking Coatings.
(6) 40 CFR Part 60 -- Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources.
The specific provisions of 40 CFR Part 60 incorporated by reference are found in Article 5 (9VAC5-50-400 et seq.) of Part II of 9VAC5-50 (New and Modified Sources).
(7) 40 CFR Part 61 -- National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
The specific provisions of 40 CFR Part 61 incorporated by reference are found in Article 1 (9VAC5-60-60 et seq.) of Part II of 9VAC5-60 (Hazardous Air Pollutant Sources).
(8) 40 CFR Part 63 -- National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories.
The specific provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 incorporated by reference are found in Article 2 (9VAC5-60-90 et seq.) of Part II of 9VAC5-60 (Hazardous Air Pollutant Sources).
(9) 40 CFR Part 64 -- Compliance Assurance Monitoring.
(10) 40 CFR Part 72 -- Permits Regulation.
(11) 40 CFR Part 73 -- Sulfur Dioxide Allowance System.
(12) 40 CFR Part 74 -- Sulfur Dioxide Opt-Ins.
(13) 40 CFR Part 75 -- Continuous Emission Monitoring.
(14) 40 CFR Part 76 -- Acid Rain Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reduction Program.
(15) 40 CFR Part 77 -- Excess Emissions.
(16) 40 CFR Part 78 -- Appeal Procedures for Acid Rain Program.
(17) 40 CFR Part 152 Subpart I -- Classification of Pesticides.
(18) 49 CFR Part 172 -- Hazardous Materials Table. Special Provisions, Hazardous Materials Communications, Emergency Response Information, and Training Requirements, Subpart E, Labeling.
(19) 29 CFR Part 1926 Subpart F -- Fire Protection and Prevention.
b. Copies may be obtained from: Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250-7954; phone (202) 783-3238.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
a. The following documents from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are incorporated herein by reference:
(1) Reich Test, Atmospheric Emissions from Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing Processes, Public Health Service Publication No. PB82250721, 1980.
(2) Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42). Volume I: Stationary and Area Sources, stock number 055-000-00500-1, 1995; Supplement A, stock number 055-000-00551-6, 1996; Supplement B, stock number 055-000-00565, 1997; Supplement C, stock number 055-000-00587-7, 1997; Supplement D, 1998; Supplement E, 1999.
(3) "Guidelines for Determining Capture Efficiency" (GD-35), Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, January 9, 1995.
b. Copies of the document identified in subdivision E 2 a (1) of this subdivision, and Volume I and Supplements A through C of the document identified in subdivision E 2 a (2) of this subdivision, may be obtained from: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161; phone 1-800-553-6847. Copies of Supplements D and E of the document identified in subdivision E 2 a (2) of this subdivision may be obtained online from EPA's Technology Transfer Network at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/index.html. Copies of the document identified in subdivision E 2 a (3) of this subdivision are only available online from EPA's Technology Transfer Network at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/guidlnd.html.
3. U.S. government.
a. The following document from the U.S. government is incorporated herein by reference: Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 (U.S. Government Printing Office stock number 041-001-00-314-2).
b. Copies may be obtained from: Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250-7954; phone (202) 512-1800.
4. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
a. The documents specified below from the American Society for Testing and Materials are incorporated herein by reference.
(1) D323-99a, "Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method)."
(2) D97-96a, "Standard Test Method for Pour Point of Petroleum Products."
(3) D129-00, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method)."
(4) D388-99, "Standard Classification of Coals by Rank."
(5) D396-98, "Standard Specification for Fuel Oils."
(6) D975-98b, "Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils."
(7) D1072-90(1999), "Standard Test Method for Total Sulfur in Fuel Gases."
(8) D1265-97, "Standard Practice for Sampling Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases (Manual Method)."
(9) D2622-98, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry."
(10) D4057-95(2000), "Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products."
(11) D4294-98, "Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum and Petroleum Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy."
(12) D523-89, "Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss" (1999).
(13) D1613-02, "Standard Test Method for Acidity in Volatile Solvents and Chemical Intermediates Used in Paint, Varnish, Lacquer and Related Products" (2002).
(14) D1640-95, "Standard Test Methods for Drying, Curing, or Film Formation of Organic Coatings at Room Temperature" (1999).
(15) E119-00a, "Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction Materials" (2000).
(16) E84-01, "Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Construction Materials" (2001).
(17) D4214-98, "Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Degree of Chalking of Exterior Paint Films" (1998).
(18) D86-04b, "Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure" (2004).
(19) D4359-90, "Standard Test Method for Determining Whether a Material is a Liquid or a Solid" (reapproved 2000).
(20) E260-96, "Standard Practice for Packed Column Gas Chromatography" (reapproved 2001).
(21) D3912-95, "Standard Test Method for Chemical Resistance of Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants" (reapproved 2001).
(22) D4082-02, "Standard Test Method for Effects of Gamma Radiation on Coatings for Use in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants."
(23) F852-99, "Standard Specification for Portable Gasoline Containers for Consumer Use" (reapproved 2006).
(24) F976-02, "Standard Specification for Portable Kerosine and Diesel Containers for Consumer Use."
(25) D4457-02, "Standard Test Method for Determination of Dichloromethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph" (reapproved 2008).
(26) D3792-05, "Standard Test Method for Water Content of Coatings by Direct Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph."
(27) D2879-97, "Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope" (reapproved 2007).
b. Copies may be obtained from: American Society for Testing Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428-2959; phone (610) 832-9585.
5. American Petroleum Institute (API).
a. The following document from the American Petroleum Institute is incorporated herein by reference: Evaporative Loss from Floating Roof Tanks, API MPMS Chapter 19, April 1, 1997.
b. Copies may be obtained from: American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, Northwest, Washington, D.C. 20005; phone (202) 682-8000.
6. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).
a. The following document from the ACGIH is incorporated herein by reference: 1991-1992 Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (ACGIH Handbook).
b. Copies may be obtained from: ACGIH, 1330 Kemper Meadow Drive, Suite 600, Cincinnati, Ohio 45240; phone (513) 742-2020.
7. National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA).
a. The documents specified below from the National Fire Prevention Association are incorporated herein by reference.
(1) NFPA 385, Standard for Tank Vehicles for Flammable and Combustible Liquids, 2000 Edition.
(2) NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2000 Edition.
(3) NFPA 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages, 2000 Edition.
b. Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Prevention Association, One Batterymarch Park, P.O. Box 9101, Quincy, Massachusetts 02269-9101; phone (617) 770-3000.
8. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
a. The documents specified below from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers are incorporated herein by reference.
(1) ASME Power Test Codes: Test Code for Steam Generating Units, Power Test Code 4.1-1964 (R1991).
(2) ASME Interim Supplement 19.5 on Instruments and Apparatus: Application, Part II of Fluid Meters, 6th edition (1971).
(3) Standard for the Qualification and Certification of Resource Recovery Facility Operators, ASME QRO-1-1994.
b. Copies may be obtained from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York, New York 10016; phone (800) 843-2763.
9. American Hospital Association (AHA).
a. The following document from the American Hospital Association is incorporated herein by reference: An Ounce of Prevention: Waste Reduction Strategies for Health Care Facilities, AHA Catalog no. W5-057007, 1993.
b. Copies may be obtained from: American Hospital Association, One North Franklin, Chicago, IL 60606; phone (800) 242-2626.
10. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD).
a. The following documents from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District are incorporated herein by reference:
(1) Method 41, "Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Solvent-Based Coatings and Related Materials Containing Parachlorobenzotrifluoride" (December 20, 1995).
(2) Method 43, "Determination of Volatile Methylsiloxanes in Solvent-Based Coatings, Inks, and Related Materials" (November 6, 1996).
b. Copies may be obtained from: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA 94109, phone (415) 771-6000.
11. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).
a. The following documents from the South Coast Air Quality Management District are incorporated herein by reference:
(1) Method 303-91, "Determination of Exempt Compounds," in Manual SSMLLABM, "Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement Samples" (1996).
(2) Method 318-95, "Determination of Weight Percent Elemental Metal in Coatings by X-Ray Diffraction," in Manual SSMLLABM, "Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement Samples" (1996).
(3) Rule 1174 Ignition Method Compliance Certification Protocol (February 28, 1991).
(4) Method 304-91, "Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Various Materials," in Manual SSMLLABM, "Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement Samples" (1996).
(5) Method 316A-92, "Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Materials Used for Pipes and Fittings" in Manual SSMLLABM, "Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement Samples" (1996).
(6) "General Test Method for Determining Solvent Losses from Spray Gun Cleaning Systems," October 3, 1989.
b. Copies may be obtained from: South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, phone (909) 396-2000.
12. California Air Resources Board (CARB).
a. The following documents from the California Air Resources Board are incorporated herein by reference:
(1) Test Method 510, "Automatic Shut-Off Test Procedure for Spill-Proof Systems and Spill-Proof Spouts" (July 6, 2000).
(2) Test Method 511, "Automatic Closure Test Procedure for Spill-Proof Systems and Spill-Proof Spouts" (July 6, 2000).
(3) Method 100, "Procedures for Continuous Gaseous Emission Stack Sampling" (July 28, 1997).
(4) Test Method 513, "Determination of Permeation Rate for Spill-Proof Systems" (July 6, 2000).
(5) Method 310, "Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Consumer Products and Reactive Organic Compounds in Aerosol Coating Products (Including Appendices A and B)" (May 5, 2005).
(6) California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5, Article 1, § 94503.5 (2003).
(7) California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5, Article 2, §§ 94509 and 94511 (2003).
(8) California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5, Article 4, §§ 94540-94555 (2003).
(9) "Certification Procedure 501 for Portable Fuel Containers and Spill-Proof Spouts, CP-501" (July 26, 2006).
(10) "Test Procedure for Determining Integrity of Spill-Proof Spouts and Spill-Proof Systems, TP-501" (July 26, 2006).
(11) "Test Procedure for Determining Diurnal Emissions from Portable Fuel Containers, TP-502" (July 26, 2006).
b. Copies may be obtained from: California Air Resources Board, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA 95812, phone (906) 322-3260 or (906) 322-2990.
13. American Architectural Manufacturers Association.
a. The following documents from the American Architectural Manufacturers Association are incorporated herein by reference:
(1) Voluntary Specification 2604-02, "Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for High Performance Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels" (2002).
(2) Voluntary Specification 2605-02, "Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for Superior Performing Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels" (2002).
b. Copies may be obtained from: American Architectural Manufacturers Association, 1827 Walden Office Square, Suite 550, Schaumburg, IL 60173, phone (847) 303-5664.
14. American Furniture Manufacturers Association.
a. The following document from the American Furniture Manufacturers Association is incorporated herein by reference: Joint Industry Fabrics Standards Committee, Woven and Knit Residential Upholstery Fabric Standards and Guidelines (January 2001).
b. Copies may be obtained from: American Furniture Manufacturers Association, P.O. Box HP-7, High Point, NC 27261; phone (336) 884-5000.
15. Petroleum Equipment Institute.
a. The following document from the Petroleum Equipment Institute is incorporated herein by reference: Recommended Practices for Installation and Testing of Vapor-Recovery Systems at Vehicle-Fueling Sites, PEI/RP300-09 (2009).
b. Copies may be obtained from: Petroleum Equipment Institute, 6931 S. 66th E. Avenue, Suite 310, Tulsa, OK 74133; telephone (918) 494-9696; www.pei.org.
9VAC5-40-5220. Standard for volatile organic compounds.
A. Petroleum liquid storage-fixed roof tanks.
1. No owner or other person shall use or permit the use of any fixed roof tank of more than 40,000 gallons capacity for storage of petroleum liquids, unless such tank is equipped with a control method
whichthat will remove, destroy, or prevent the discharge into the atmosphere of at least 90% by weight of volatile organic compound emissions.2. Achievement of the emission standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection by use of methods in 9VAC5-40-5230 A will be acceptable to the board.
3. The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable to fixed roof tanks having capacities less than 400,000 gallons for crude oil or condensate stored, processed, or treated at a drilling and production facility prior to custody transfer.
4. The owner of a fixed roof tank subject to the provisions of subdivision 1 of this subsection shall:
a. When the fixed roof tank is equipped with an internal floating roof, perform a visual inspection annually of the floating cover through roof hatches
,to ascertain compliance with the specifications in subdivisions4 a(1) and (2) of thissubsectionsubdivision A 4 a.(1) The cover should be uniformly floating on or above the liquid and there should be no visible defects in the surface of the cover or liquid accumulated on the cover.
(2) The seal must be intact and uniformly in place around the circumference of the cover between the cover and tank wall.
b. Perform a complete inspection of the cover and seal and record the condition of the cover and seal when the tank is emptied for nonoperational reasons such as maintenance, an emergency, or other similar purposes.
c. Maintain records of the throughput quantities and types of petroleum liquids stored, the average monthly storage temperature and true vapor pressure of the liquid as stored, and the results of the inspections performed under the provisions of subdivisions 4 a and 4 b of this subsection.
B. Petroleum liquid storage--floating roof tanks.
1. No owner or other person shall use or permit the use of any floating roof tank of more than 40,000 gallons capacity for storage of petroleum liquids, unless such tank is equipped with a control method
whichthat will remove, destroy, or prevent the discharge into the atmosphere of at least 90% by weight of volatile organic compound emissions.2. Achievement of the emission standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection by use of methods in 9VAC5-40-5230 B will be acceptable to the board.
3. The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable to the following:
a. Floating roof tanks having capacities less than 400,000 gallons for crude oil or condensate stored, processed, or treated at a drilling and production facility prior to custody transfer.
b. Floating roof tanks storing waxy, heavy pour crude oil.
4. The owner of a floating roof tank subject to the provisions of subdivision 1 of this subsection shall:
a. Perform routine inspections annually which shall include a visual inspection of the secondary seal gap.
b. When the floating roof is equipped with a vapor-mounted primary seal, measure the secondary seal gap annually in accordance with subdivisions
4 b(1) and (2) of thissubsectionsubdivision B 4 b.(1) Physically
measuringmeasure the length and width of all gaps around the entire circumference of the secondary seal in each place where a 1/8-inch uniform diameter probe passes freely (without forcing or binding against the seal) between the seal and tank wall; and(2)
SummingSum the area of the individual gaps.c. Maintain records of the types of petroleum liquids stored, the maximum true vapor pressure of the liquid as stored, and the results of the inspections performed under the provisions of subdivisions
4a and b of thissubsectionsubdivision B 4.C. Gasoline bulk loading--bulk terminals.
1. No owner or other person shall cause or permit the discharge into the atmosphere from a bulk gasoline terminal (including any appurtenant equipment necessary to load the tank truck compartments) any volatile organic compound in excess of .67 pounds per 1,000 gallons of gasoline loaded.
2. Achievement of the emission standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection by use of methods in 9VAC5-40-5230 C will be acceptable to the board.
D. Gasoline bulk loading--bulk plants.
1. No owner or other person shall use or permit the use of any bulk gasoline plant (including any appurtenant equipment necessary to load or unload tank trucks and account trucks) unless such plant is equipped with a vapor control system that will remove, destroy, or prevent the discharge into the atmosphere of at least 77% by weight of volatile organic compound emissions.
2. Achievement of the emission standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection by use of methods in 9VAC5-40-5230 D will be acceptable to the board.
3. The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable to facilities whose average daily throughput of gasoline is less than 4,000 gallons per working day when based on a 30-day rolling average. Average daily throughput means the average daily amount of gasoline pumped at a gasoline dispensing facility during the most recent 30-day period. Average daily throughput shall be calculated for the two most recent consecutive calendar years. If during this two-year period or any period thereafter, the average daily throughput exceeds 4,000 gallons per working day, the facility is no longer exempt from the provisions of subdivision 1 of this subsection.
E. Transfer of gasoline--gasoline dispensing facilities--Stage I vapor control systems.
1. No owner or other person shall transfer or permit the transfer of gasoline from any tank truck into any stationary storage tank unless such tank is equipped with a vapor control system that will remove, destroy, or prevent the discharge into the atmosphere of at least 90% by weight of volatile organic compound emissions.
2. Achievement of the emission standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection by use of methods in 9VAC5-40-5230 E will be acceptable to the board.
3. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the following:
a. Transfers made to storage tanks that are either less than 250 gallons in capacity or located at facilities whose average monthly throughput of gasoline is less than 10,000 gallons.
b. Transfers made to storage tanks equipped with floating roofs or their equivalent.
F. Transfer of gasoline--gasoline dispensing facilities--Stage II vapor recovery systems.
1. No owner or other person shall transfer or permit the transfer of gasoline into the fuel tank of any motor vehicle at any affected gasoline dispensing facility unless the transfer is made using a certified Stage II vapor recovery system that is designed, operated, and maintained such that the vapor recovery system removes, destroys, or prevents the discharge into the atmosphere of at least 95% by weight of volatile organic compound emissions.
2. Achievement of the emission standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection by use of methods in 9VAC5-40-5230 F will be acceptable to the board.
3. The affected gasoline facilities shall be in compliance with the emissions standard in subdivision 1 of this subsection according to the following schedule:
a. Facilities which begin actual construction on or after January 1, 1993, must comply upon startup unless the facility can prove it is exempt under the provisions of subdivision 4 of this subsection.
b. Facilities which begin actual construction after November 15, 1990, and before January 1, 1993, must comply by May 15, 1993.
c. Facilities which begin actual construction on or before November 15, 1990, and dispense an average monthly throughput of 100,000 gallons or more of gasoline must comply by November 15, 1993.
d. All other affected facilities which begin actual construction on or before November 15, 1990, must comply by November 15, 1994.
4. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the following facilities:
a. Gasoline dispensing facilities with an average monthly throughput of 10,000 gallons or less.
b. Gasoline dispensing facilities owned by independent small business gasoline marketers with an average monthly throughput of 50,000 gallons or less.
c. Gasoline dispensing devices that are used exclusively for refueling marine vehicles, aircraft, farm equipment, and emergency vehicles.
5. Any gasoline dispensing facility subject to the provisions of this subsection shall also comply with the provisions of subsection E of this section (Stage I vapor controls).
6. In accordance with the provisions of AQP-9, Procedures for Implementation of Regulations Covering Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (see 9VAC5-20-121), owners of affected gasoline dispensing facilities shall:
a. Register the Stage II system with the board and submit Stage II vapor recovery equipment specifications at least 90 days prior to installation of the Stage II vapor recovery system. Owners of gasoline dispensing facilities in existence as of January 1, 1993, shall contact the board by February 1, 1993, and register the Stage II vapor recovery system according to the schedule outlined in AQP-9. Any repair or modification to an existing Stage II vapor recovery system that changes the approved configuration shall be reported to the board no later than 30 days after completion of such repair or modification.
b. Perform tests, before the equipment is made available for use by the public, on the entire Stage II vapor recovery system to ensure the proper functioning of nozzle automatic shut-off mechanisms and flow prohibiting mechanisms where applicable, and perform a pressure decay/leak test, a vapor space tie test, and a liquid blockage test. In cases where use of one of the test methods in AQP-9 is not feasible for a particular Stage II vapor recovery system, the owner may, upon approval of the board, use an alternative test method.
c. No later than 15 days after system testing is completed, submit to the board documentation showing the results of the tests outlined in subdivision 6 b of this subsection.
d. Ensure that the Stage II vapor recovery system is vapor tight by performing a pressure decay/leak test and a liquid blockage test at least every five years, upon major system replacement or modification, or if requested by the board after evidence of a system malfunction which compromises the efficiency of the system.
e. Notify the board at least two days prior to Stage II vapor recovery system testing as required by subdivisions 6 b and 6 d of this subsection.
f. Conspicuously post operating instructions for the vapor recovery system on each gasoline dispensing pump which includes the following information:
(1) A statement, as described in Part III F 1 of AQP-9 (see 9VAC5-20-121), describing the benefits of the Stage II vapor recovery system.
(2) A clear description of how to correctly dispense gasoline with the vapor recovery nozzles.
(3) A warning that repeated attempts to continue dispensing gasoline
,after the system has indicated that the vehicle fuel tank is full (by automatically shutting off) may result in spillage or recirculation of gasoline.(4) A telephone number to report problems experienced with the vapor recovery system to the board.
g. Promptly and conspicuously post "Out Of Order" signs on any nozzle associated with any part of the vapor recovery system
whichthat is defective if use of that nozzle would allow escape of gasoline vapors to the atmosphere. "Out of order" signs shall not be removed from affected nozzles until said system has been repaired.h. Provide adequate training and written instructions for facility personnel to assure proper operation of the vapor recovery system.
i. Perform routine maintenance inspections of the Stage II vapor recovery system on a daily and monthly basis and record the monthly inspection results as specified in Part III E of AQP-9 (see 9VAC5-20-121).
j. Maintain records on site, in a form and manner acceptable to the board, of operator training, system registration and equipment approval, and maintenance, repair and testing of the system. Original documents may be maintained at a centralized location only if copies of these documents are maintained onsite according to the requirements set forth in AQP-9. Records shall be retained for a period of at least two years, unless specified otherwise, and shall be made immediately available for inspection by the board upon request.
7. The requirements of this subsection shall apply to the localities specified in 9VAC5-40-5200 B 2 until the following dates, after which the decommissioning or maintenance requirements of subdivision 8 or 9 of this subsection shall be followed.
a. For the Northern Virginia Volatile Organic Compound Control Area: January 1, 2014.
b. For the Richmond Volatile Organic Compound Control Area (which shall not include Prince George County and Petersburg City): January 1, 2017.
8. No owner or other person decommissioning any Stage II equipment shall be relieved from the continuing proper operation and maintenance of Stage I vapor control systems. In order to assure the proper operation and maintenance of Stage I equipment, all of the Stage II decommissioning procedures in this subdivision F 8 shall be completed:
a. Notify the board in writing prior to removing or discontinuing all or part of an existing Stage II system. All notifications shall include:
(1) Name, address, contact name, telephone number, and registration number;
(2) Details and cost of project, and the name of the service provider for the project; and
(3) Start date and projected completion date.
A copy of this notification shall be maintained with on-site records.
b. Decommission the discontinued Stage II system or, in the case of removal and replacement of an existing dispenser system, decommission each dispenser system piping in accordance with all applicable steps provided in the Recommended Practices for Installation and Testing of Vapor-Recovery Systems at Vehicle-Fueling Sites, PEI/RP300-09, Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI) (see 9VAC5-20-21), or an alternative procedure as approved by the board.
c. Notify the board in writing no more than 30 days after decommissioning all or part of a Stage II system. All notifications shall include:
(1) Name, address, contact name, telephone number, and registration number;
(2) Name and telephone number of the qualified technician or qualified service provider or both who decommissioned the Stage II equipment;
(3) Date decommissioning was complete and type of Stage II system;
(4) Steps used in decommissioning or a completed PEI checklist form (Appendix C of PEI/RP300-09);
(5) Copy of pressure decay test conducted after decommissioning was complete; and
(6) Statement from the service provider verifying the storage system has been left in a condition that will reliably prevent the release of any vapors or liquids from any component of the storage system associated with the Stage II system.
A copy of this notification shall be maintained with on-site records.
9. No owner or other person that continues to operate Stage II equipment in lieu of following the decommissioning procedures in subdivision 8 of this subsection shall be relieved from the continuing proper operation and maintenance of the Stage II equipment in compliance with this article.
G. Tank trucks/account trucks and vapor collection systems.
1. No owner or other person shall use or permit the use of any tank truck or account truck that is loaded or unloaded at facilities subject to the provisions of subsection C, D, or E of this section unless such truck is designed, maintained, and certified to be vapor tight. In addition, there shall be no avoidable visible liquid leaks. Invariably there will be a few drops of liquid from disconnection of dry breaks in liquid lines even when well maintained; these drops are allowed.
2. Vapor-laden tank trucks or account trucks exclusively serving facilities subject to subsection D or E of this section may be refilled only at facilities in compliance with subsection C of this section.
3. Tank truck and account truck hatches shall be closed at all times during loading and unloading operations (periods during which there is liquid flow into or out of the truck) at facilities subject to the provisions of subsection C, D, or E of this section.
4. During loading or unloading operations at facilities subject to the provisions of subsection C, D, or E of this section, there shall be no volatile organic compound concentrations greater than or equal to 100% of the lower explosive limit (LEL, measured as propane) at 2.5 centimeters around the perimeter of a potential leak source as detected by a combustible gas detector. In addition, there shall be no avoidable visible liquid leaks. Invariably there will be a few liquid drops from the disconnection of well-maintained bottom loading dry breaks and the raising of well-maintained top loading vapor heads; these few drops are allowed. The vapor collection system includes all piping, seals, hoses, connection, pressure-vacuum vents, and other possible leak sources between the truck and the vapor disposal unit and between the storage tanks and vapor recovery unit.
5. The vapor collection and vapor disposal equipment must be designed and operated to prevent gauge pressure in the tank truck from exceeding 18 in H20 and prevent vacuum from exceeding 6 in H20.
6. Testing to determine compliance with subdivision 1 of this subsection shall be conducted and reported and data shall be reduced as set forth in procedures approved by the board using test methods specified there. All tests shall be conducted by, or under the direction of, a person qualified by training or experience in the field of air pollution testing, or tank truck maintenance and testing and approved by the board.
7. Monitoring to confirm the continuing existence of leak tight conditions specified in subdivision 4 of this subsection shall be conducted as set forth in procedures approved by the board using test methods specified there.
8. Owners of tank trucks and account trucks subject to the provisions of subdivision 1 of this subsection shall certify
,each year that the trucks are vapor tight in accordance with test procedures specified in subdivision 6 of this subsection. Trucks that are not vapor tight must be repaired within 15 days of the test and be tested and certified as vapor tight.9. Each truck subject to the provisions of subdivision 1 of this subsection shall have information displayed on the tank indicating the expiration date of the certification and such other information as may be needed by the board to determine the validity of the certification. The means of display and location of
the abovethis information shall be in a manner acceptable to the board.10. An owner of a vapor collection/control system shall repair and retest the system within 15 days of the testing, if it exceeds the limit specified in subdivision 4 of this subsection.
11. The owner of a tank/account truck or vapor collection/control system or both subject to the provisions of this section shall maintain records of all certification testing and repairs. The records must identify the tank/account truck, vapor collection system, or vapor control system; the date of the test or repair; and, if applicable, the type of repair and the date of retest. The records must be maintained in a legible, readily available condition for at least two years after the date testing or repair was completed.
12. The records of certification tests required by subdivision 11 of this subsection shall, as a minimum, contain the following:
a. The tank/account truck tank identification number;
b. The initial test pressure and the time of the reading;
c. The final test pressure and the time of the reading;
d. The initial test vacuum and the time of the reading;
e. The final test vacuum and the time of the reading; and
f. Name and the title of the person conducting the test.
13. Copies of all records and reports required by this section shall immediately be made available to the board, upon verbal or written request, at any reasonable time.
14. The board may, at any time, monitor a tank/account truck, vapor collection system, or vapor control system
,by the method referenced in subdivision 6 or 7 of this subsection to confirm continuing compliance with subdivision 1 or 4 of this subsection.15. If, after over one year of monitoring (i.e., at least two complete annual checks), the owner of a truck subject to the provisions of subdivision 6 of this subsection feels that modification of the requirements are in order, the owner may request in writing to the board that a revision be made. The request should include data that have been developed to justify any modifications in the monitoring schedule. On the other hand, if the board finds an excessive number of leaks during an inspection, or if the owner finds an excessive number of leaks during scheduled monitoring, consideration shall be given to increasing the frequency of inspection.
9VAC5-40-5270. Standard for toxic pollutants.
The provisions of
Article 3 (9VAC5-40-160 et seq.) of this chapter (Emission Standards for Toxic Pollutants, Rule 4-3)Article 4, Emission Standards for Toxic Pollutants from Existing Sources, (9VAC5-60-200 et seq.) of Part I of Hazardous Air Pollutant Sources apply.VA.R. Doc. No. R15-4006; Filed May 27, 2015, 11:19 a.m.