8 General Notices/Errata

GENERAL NOTICES/ERRATA

Vol. 28 Iss. 5 - November 07, 2011

GENERAL NOTICES/ERRATA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Proposed Enforcement Action for Aqua Virginia Utilities, Inc.

An enforcement action has been proposed for Aqua Virginia Utilities, Inc. in order to complete corrective action requirements on the recently purchased Manakin Farms subdivision treatment system located at Route 6 & Hermitage Road in Goochland County, Virginia. Manakin Water and Sewerage Company was issued an enforcement action on June 25, 2010, to complete corrective action on the Manakin Farms wastewater treatment system. This proposed action transfers the corrective action requirements to Aqua Virginia Utilities, Inc. A description of the proposed action is available at the Department of Environmental Quality office named below or online at www.deq.virginia.gov. Frank Lupini will accept comments by email at [e-mail], FAX [phone], or postal mail Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Regional Office, 4949-A Cox Road, Glen Allen, VA, 23060, from November 7, 2011, to December 7, 2011.

Revised Notice of Bacteria TMDL Modification of James River and Tributaries – Lower Piedmont Region in Goochland, Fluvanna, Louisa, Powhatan, and Cumberland Counties, Virginia

The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) seeks public comment from interested persons on proposed minor modifications of the total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) developed for impaired segments: Byrd Creek, Beaverdam Creek, Fine Creek, and the James River (segments upper H33R-01 and lower H38R-04).

A TMDL of E. coli was developed to address the bacterial impairments in the waterways and counties mentioned above. This TMDL was approved by the Environmental Protection Agency on June 11, 2008. The report is available at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/tmdl/apptmdls/jamesrvr/jmsgrp2.pdf. The DEQ seeks written comments from interested persons on 38 minor modifications for this TMDL.

Six modifications are proposed for the Byrd Creek TMDL. Modifications one through four are to add domestic dischargers (VAG408275, VAG408281, VAG408344, VAG408404), which are single family home facilities with a design flow each of 0.001 million gallons per day (MGD). Facility VAG408275 discharges to Byrd Creek Un-named Tributary (UT), both facilities VAG408281 and VAG408344 discharge to Phils Creek UT, and facility VAG408404 discharges to Venable Creek UT. All four tributaries lie within the Byrd Creek drainage. Based on the design flow at the standard, these permits each should have a waste load allocation (WLA) of 1.74E+09 colony forming units per year (cfu/yr) for E. coli in the Byrd Creek TMDL. DEQ proposes to subtract the combined load of these permits from the "Future Growth" load. Modifications five and six are to change permit numbers for domestic dischargers VAG406343 and VAG406346, which both discharge to Venable Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage. These two facilities' numbers will now be identified in the report as VAG406521 and VAG406520, respectively. The final revised "Future Growth" load as a result of modifications one through four will equal 8.87E+10 (cfu/yr) E. coli. The proposed changes for the Byrd Creek TMDL are equal to <1.0%.

Three modifications are proposed for the Beaverdam Creek TMDL. First, DEQ proposes to remove facility Huguenot Academy (VA0063037), which should not have been given a waste load allocation (WLA) in the Beaverdam Creek TMDL because it discharges to the Fine Creek drainage. The WLA of 6.96E+09 (cfu/yr) E. coli based on a maximum discharge of 0.004 MGD will be added to the "Future Growth" load for the Beaverdam Creek TMDL. Second, DEQ proposes to remove facility James River Correctional Center (VA0020681), which no longer discharges to Beaverdam Creek. The WLA of 3.76E+11 (cfu/yr) E. coli based on a maximum discharge of 0.216 MGD will be added to the "Future Growth" load for Beaverdam Creek. Third, DEQ proposes to add a new WLA, Oilville Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) (VA0092428), which is a municipal facility with a maximum discharge of 0.3 MGD, by subtracting from the "Future Growth" load of Beaverdam Creek. The WLA to be assigned to this facility based on design flow at the standard is equal to 5.23E+11 (cfu/yr) E. coli. The revised "Future Growth" load in Beaverdam Creek as a result of these three modifications will be 2.57E+12 (cfu/yr). The proposed changes for the Beaverdam Creek TMDL are equal to < 1.0%.

One modification is proposed for the Fine Creek TMDL, which is to add a WLA for discharger Huguenot Academy (VA0063037), originally allocated to Beaverdam Creek by mistake. A WLA of 6.96E+09 (cfu/yr) E. coli will be assigned to the facility from the "Future Growth" load of Fine Creek. The revised "Future Growth" load in Fine Creek as a result of this modification will be 2.96E+10 (cfu/yr). The proposed changes for the Fine Creek TMDL are equal to < 1.0%.

Thirteen modifications are proposed for the upper James River (H33R-01) segment. The previous total WLA for the James River upper segment, 3.54E+11 (cfu/yr) E. coli, was incorrect. DEQ proposes to change this number to 3.50E+11 (cfu/yr) in the TMDL document, which is the correct total WLA for the James River upper segment. The correction of the James River upper segment total WLA affects no other allocations in the TMDL and is equal to <1.0%. The second and third modifications are to remove the WLAs for domestic dischargers VAG404239 and VAG404240, which are domestic facilities which were never constructed and whose permits have been allowed to expire. DEQ proposes to add the combined load of these permits, which were each given a WLA of 1.74E+09 (cfu/yr) E. coli in the upper James River (H33R-01) segment TMDL, to the "Future Growth" load. Modifications four through twelve for the upper James River (H33R-01) segment include the addition of nine domestic dischargers (VAG404226, VAG404262, VAG404276, VAG404277, VAG406347, VAG408275, VAG408281, VAG408344, and VAG408404) with a maximum discharge of 0.001 MGD each.  VAG404226 discharges to Maple Swamp Creek UT in the upper James River segment drainage, both VAG404262 and VAG404276 discharge to Stegers Creek UT in the upper James River segment drainage, VAG404277 discharges to Horsepen Branch UT in the upper James River segment drainage, VAG406347 discharges to the Venable Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage, VAG408275 discharges to Byrd Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage, both VAG408281 and VAG408344 discharge to Phils Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage, and VAG408404 discharges to Venable Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage. Based on the design flow at the standard, these permits each should have a WLA of 1.74E+09 (cfu/yr) for E. coli in the upper James River (H33R-01) segment TMDL. DEQ proposes a WLA of 1.74E+09 (cfu/yr) be assigned to each discharger, subtracted from the "Future Growth" for the James River upper segment.  Modifications thirteen and fourteen are to change permit numbers for domestic dischargers VAG406343 and VAG406346, which both discharge to Venable Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage and received a WLA in the James River "upper" segment.  These two facilities numbers will now be identified in the report as VAG406521 and VAG406520, respectively. The revised "Future Growth" as a result of modifications two through twelve will be 2.70E+11 (cfu/yr) E. coli. The proposed changes for the upper James River (H33R-01) TMDL are equal to <1.0%.

Fifteen modifications are proposed for the lower James River (H38R-04) TMDL. Modifications one through three are to correct the original values of Future Growth, total WLA, and LA, which were 6.54E+12, 7.91E+12, and 3.91E+15 (cfu/yr) E.coli, respectively. Future Growth values are calculated as five times the WLA of Individual VPDES dischargers. However, 6.54E+12 (cfu/yr) is not the correct original future growth value; it is 6.82E+12 (cfu/yr) E. coli. The total WLA is the addition of each individual WLAs plus Future Growth.  Because Future Growth was calculated incorrectly, 7.91E+12 (cfu/yr) is not the correct total WLA value, it is 8.20E+12 (cfu/yr) E. coli.  The LA is calculated by subtracting the total WLA from the TMDL.  Because the total WLA was calculated based on an incorrect value of Future Growth, 3.91E+15 (cfu/yr) is not the correct LA value, it is 3.90E+15 (cfu/yr) E.coli. The original Future Growth correction will not be reflected in the revised TMDL document; however, it is used as the baseline for calculating the revised Future Growth as a result of other modifications listed below. DEQ proposes to correct the reported total WLA and LA values to 8.20E+12 and 3.90E+15 (cfy/yr) E.coli, respectively, in the modified TMDL document. The fourth and fifth modifications are to remove the WLAs for domestic dischargers VAG404239 and VAG404240, which are domestic facilities never constructed and whose permits have been allowed to expire.  DEQ proposes to add the combined load of these permits, which were each given a WLA of 1.74E+09 (cfu/yr) E. coli in the upper James River (H33R-01) segment TMDL, to the "Future Growth" load. Modifications six through twelve for the lower James River (H38R-04) segment include the addition of seven domestic dischargers (VAG404262, VAG404276, VAG404277, VAG408275, VAG408281, VAG408344, and VAG408404) with a maximum discharge of 0.001 MGD each. Based on the design flow at the standard, these permits each should have a WLA of 1.74E+09 (cfu/yr) for E. coli in the TMDL.  DEQ proposes a WLA of 1.74E+09 (cfu/yr) be assigned to each discharger, subtracted from the "Future Growth" load for the James River lower segment.  For modification thirteen, DEQ proposes the removal of the WLA for facility DOC Powhatan Correctional Center (VA020699), whose outfall discharges below the James River "lower" impaired segment.  The WLA of 8.09E+11 (cfu/yr) E. coli based on a maximum discharge of 0.465 MGD will be added to the "Future Growth" load for James River "lower" segment.  Modifications fourteen and fifteen are to change permit numbers for domestic dischargers VAG406343 and VAG406346, which both discharge to Venable Creek UT in the Byrd Creek drainage and received a WLA in the James River "lower" segment. These two facilities' numbers will now be identified in the report as VAG406521 and VAG406520, respectively. The revised "Future Growth" as a result of modifications one and four through thirteen will be 7.62E+12(cfu/yr) E. coli for the lower James River segment.  The proposed changes for the lower James River (H38R-04) TMDL are equal to <1.0%.

The proposed WLA changes above will neither cause nor contribute to the nonattainment of the James River basin. The public comment period for these modifications will end on December 7, 2011. Please send comments to Margaret Smigo, Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Regional Office, 4969-A Cox Road, Glen Allen, VA 23060, email at [e-mail], or FAX (Attn. Margaret Smigo) at [phone]. Following the comment period, a modification letter and any comments received will be sent to EPA for approval.

Proposed Consent Order for KVK Precision Specialties, Inc.

An enforcement action has been proposed for KVK Precision Specialties, Inc. for violations in Page County. A proposed consent order describes a settlement to resolve an unauthorized discharge. A description of the proposed action is available at the Department of Environmental Quality office named below or online at www.deq.virginia.gov. Steven W. Hetrick will accept comments by email at [e-mail], FAX [phone], or postal mail Department of Environmental Quality, Valley Regional Office, P.O. Box 3000, 4411 Early Road, Harrisonburg, VA 22801, from November 7, 2011, to December 7, 2011.

Total Maximum Daily Loads for Long Meadow Run and Turley Creek in Rockingham County

The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) seek written and oral comments from interested persons on the development of total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for Long Meadow Run and Turley Creek in Rockingham County. These streams were listed in 2002 as impaired due to violations of the state's general water quality standard (benthic) for aquatic life. The aquatic life impairment on Long Meadow Run extends from its headwaters to the confluence with the North Fork Shenandoah River, which is a total of 8.53 miles. The Turley Creek aquatic life impairment extends a total of 4.01 miles from its headwaters to the confluence with the North Fork Shenandoah River.

Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and § 62.1-44.19:7 C of the Code of Virginia require DEQ to develop TMDLs for pollutants responsible for each impaired water contained in Virginia's 303(d) TMDL Priority List and Report.

The first public meeting on the development of these TMDLs will be held on Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 7 p.m. at J. Frank Hillyard Middle School, 226 Hawks Hill Drive, Broadway, VA 22815. Directly following the meeting will be the first Technical Advisory Committee meeting to discuss several technical issues and gather additional, specific input. All are welcome to attend either or both meetings.

The public comment period for the first public meeting will end on December 19, 2011. Written comments should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person submitting the comments and should be sent to Tara Sieber, Department of Environmental Quality, 4411 Early Road, P.O. Box 3000, Harrisonburg, VA 22801, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail].

Total Maximum Daily Load for Powells Creek, Quantico Creek, South Fork Quantico Creek, North Branch Chopawamsic Creek, Austin Run, Accokeek Creek, Potomac Creek, Potomac Run, and an Unnamed Tributary to the Potomac River

Announcement of total maximum daily load (TMDL) studies to restore water quality in the bacteria impaired waters of Powells Creek, Quantico Creek, South Fork Quantico Creek, North Branch Chopawamsic Creek, Austin Run, Accokeek Creek, Potomac Creek, Potomac Run, and an Unnamed Tributary to the Potomac River.

Purpose of notice: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) announce the third Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting to address the development of TMDLs for several tributaries to the Potomac River.

Technical advisory committee meeting: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m., John M. Porter Memorial Library, Meeting Room A, 2001 Parkway Blvd., Stafford, VA 22554.

Meeting description: This is the third TAC meeting to address the bacteria TMDL studies for Powells Creek, Quantico Creek, South Fork Quantico Creek, North Branch Chopawamsic Creek, Austin Run, Accokeek Creek, Potomac Creek, Potomac Run, and an Unnamed Tributary to the Potomac River. The purpose of the TAC is to provide technical input and insight for the project, and to assist with stakeholder and public participation.

Description of study: Portions of the following streams have been identified as impaired on the Clean Water Act § 303(d) list for not supporting Virginia's water quality recreational use standard due to exceedances of the bacteria criterion:

Waterbody Name	Watershed Location	Segment Size	Cause	Segment Description
Powells Creek	Prince William County	4.62 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins approximately 0.2 rivermiles below Lake Montclair and continues downstream until the end of the free-flowing waters of Powells Creek.
Quantico Creek	Prince William County Town of Dumfries	1.45 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the confluence with South Fork Quantico Creek, approximately 0.75 rivermile upstream from I-95, and continues downstream until the start of the tidal waters of Quantico Bay.
South Fork Quantico Creek	Prince William County Town of Dumfries	4.63 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the headwaters of the South Fork Quantico Creek and continues downstream until the start of the impounded waters, adjacent to what is labeled as Mawavi Camp No 2 on the Joplin quad.
North Branch Chopawamsic Creek	Stafford County Prince William County	6.9 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the headwaters of North Branch Chopawamsic Creek and continues downstream until the confluence with Middle Branch.
Austin Run	Fauquier County Stafford County	0.79 miles	Fecal Coliform	Segment begins at the confluence with an unnamed tributary to Austin Run (streamcode XGQ) and continues downstream until the confluence with Aquia Creek.
Accokeek Creek	Stafford County	4.21 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the confluence with an unnamed tributary to Accokeek Creek (rivermile 8.62), approximately 0.33 rivermile downstream from Route 1, and continues downstream until the end of the free-flowing waters.
Potomac Creek	Stafford County	2.18 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the railroad crossing at the west end of swamp, upstream from Route 608, and continues downstream until the east end of swamp.
Potomac Run	Stafford County	6.13 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the headwaters of Potomac Run and continues downstream until the confluence with Long Branch.
Unnamed Tributary to the Potomac River	Stafford County	2.9 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the headwaters of the unnamed tributary and continues downstream until its confluence with the Potomac River.

Virginia agencies are working to identify sources of bacteria contamination in these stream segments. During this study, DEQ will develop a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for each of the impaired stream segments. A TMDL is the total amount of a pollutant a water body can receive and still meet

water quality standards. To restore water quality, pollutant levels have to be reduced to the TMDL allocated amount.

How to comment: The public comment period on the materials presented at the TAC meeting will extend from November 15, 2011, to December 15, 2011. DEQ accepts written comments by email, fax, or postal mail. Written

comments should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person commenting, and be received by DEQ during the comment period. Please send all comments to the contact listed below.

Contact for additional information: Katie Conaway, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 13901 Crown Court, Woodbridge, VA 22193, telephone [phone], or email [e-mail].

Restore Water Quality in Tributaries of the New River

Announcement of an effort to restore water quality in the following tributaries of the New River: South Fork Reed Creek, Mill Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, Reed Creek, Miller Creek, and Cove Creek in Wythe County, Virginia.

Public meeting location: Wythe Bland Conference Room, Wythe County Community Hospital, 600 West Ridge Road, Wytheville, Virginia, on November 15, 2011, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Purpose of notice: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Department of Conservation and Recreation are announcing an effort to restore water quality, a public comment opportunity, and public meeting.

Meeting description: First public meeting on a study to restore water quality.

Description of study: DEQ has been working to identify sources of bacterial contamination in South Fork Reed Creek, Mill Creek, Stony Fork, Tate Run, Reed Creek, Miller Creek, and Cove Creek in Wythe County, Virginia. The streams are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard.

During the study, DEQ will determine the sources of bacterial contamination and develop a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for bacteria. To restore water quality, contamination levels must be reduced to the TMDL amount. A TMDL is the total amount of a pollutant a water body can contain and still meet water quality standards.

How a decision is made: The development of a TMDL includes public meetings and a public comment period once the study report is drafted. After public comments have been considered and addressed, DEQ will submit the TMDL report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for approval.

How to comment: DEQ accepts written comments by email, fax, or postal mail. Written comments should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person commenting and be received by DEQ during the comment period, November 15, 2011, to December 15, 2011. DEQ also accepts written and oral comments at the public meeting announced in this notice.

To review fact sheets: Fact sheets are available on the impaired waters from the contacts below or on the DEQ website at www.deq.virginia.gov/tmdl.

Contact for additional information: Martha Chapman, TMDL Coordinator, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Southwest Regional Office, 355 Deadmore Street, P.O. Box 1688, Abingdon, VA 24212-1688, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail].

Proposed Enforcement Action for S.B. Cox Ready Mix, Inc.

An enforcement action has been proposed for S.B. Cox Ready Mix, Inc. for alleged violations at four cement ready mix plants. The location of the facilities where the violations occurred are Route 250 West of Little Tuckahoe Creek in Goochland County, 1601 Portugee Road in Henrico County, VA, 16456 Washington Highway in Doswell, VA, and 1920 Anderson Highway in Powhatan County, VA. The order requires corrective action and payment of a civil charge. A description of the proposed action is available at the DEQ office named below or online at www.deq.virginia.gov. Frank Lupini will accept comments by email at [e-mail], FAX [phone], or postal mail Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Regional Office, 4949-A Cox Road, Glen Allen, VA 23060, from November 7, 2011, to December 7, 2011.

Total Maximum Daily Load for Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run

Announcement of total maximum daily load (TMDL) studies to restore water quality in the bacteria impaired waters of Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run.

Purpose of notice: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) announce the third Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting to address the development of TMDLs for several tributaries to the Potomac River.

Technical advisory committee meeting: Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., Great Falls Library, Meeting Room, 9830 Georgetown Pike, Great Falls, Virginia 22066.

Meeting description: This is the third TAC meeting to address the bacteria TMDL studies for Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run.  The purpose of the TAC is to provide technical input and insight for the project, and to assist with stakeholder and public participation.

Description of study: Portions of the following streams have been identified as impaired on the Clean Water Act § 303(d) list for not supporting Virginia's water quality recreational use standard due to exceedances of the bacteria criterion:

Waterbody Name	Watershed Location	Segment Size	Cause	Segment Description
Sugarland Run	Fairfax County Loudoun County Town of Herndon	0.95 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the confluence with Folly Lick Branch, at approximately rivermile 5.75, and continues downstream until the boundary of the PWS designation area, at rivermile 4.82.
Sugarland Run	Fairfax County Loudoun County Town of Herndon	4.77 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the boundary of the PWS designation area, at rivermile 4.82, and continues downstream until the confluence with the Potomac River.
Mine Run	Fairfax County	0.93 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the confluence with an unnamed tributary to Mine Run, approximately 0.5 rivermile upstream from River Bend Road, and continues downstream until the confluence with the Potomac River.
Pimmit Run	Arlington County Fairfax County	1.62 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the confluence with Little Pimmit Run, approximately 0.1 rivermile downstream from Route 695, and continues downstream until the confluence with the Potomac River.
Pimmit Run	Arlington County Fairfax County	2.46 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the Route 309 bridge crossing, at rivermile 4.16, and continues downstream until the confluence with Little Pimmit Run, approximately 0.1 rivermile downstream from Route 695.
Pimmit Run	Arlington County Fairfax County	3.29 miles	Escherichia coli	Segment begins at the headwaters of Pimmit Run, approximately 0.12 rivermile upstream from Route 7, and continues downstream until the Route 309 bridge crossing, at rivermile 4.16.

Virginia agencies are working to identify sources of bacteria contamination in these stream segments. During this study, DEQ will develop a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for each of the impaired stream segments. A TMDL is the total amount of a pollutant a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards. To restore water quality, pollutant levels have to be reduced to the TMDL allocated amount.

How to comment: The public comment period on the materials presented at the TAC meeting will extend from November 16, 2011, to December 16, 2011. DEQ accepts

written comments by email, fax, or postal mail. Written comments should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person commenting, and be received by DEQ during the comment period. Please send all comments to the contact listed below.

Contact for additional information: Katie Conaway, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 13901 Crown Court, Woodbridge, VA 22193, telephone [phone], or email [e-mail].

DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC SCIENCE

Approval of Field Tests for Detection of Drugs

In accordance with 6VAC40-30, the Regulations for the Approval of Field Tests for Detection of Drugs, and under the authority of the Code of Virginia, the following field tests for detection of drugs are approved field tests:

O D V INCORPORATED 13386 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32218-2383
ODV NarcoPouch
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Heroin	902 – Marquis Reagent
Amphetamine	902 – Marquis Reagent
Methamphetamine	902 – Marquis Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	902 – Marquis Reagent
Cocaine Hydrochloride	904 or 904B – Cocaine HCl and Base Reagent
Cocaine Base	904 or 904B – Cocaine HCl and Base Reagent
Barbiturates	905 – Dille-Koppanyi Reagent
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)	907 – Ehrlich's (Modified) Reagent
Marijuana	908 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Hashish Oil	908 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Marijuana	909 – K N Reagent
Hashish Oil	909 – K N Reagent
Phencyclidine (PCP) Reagent	914 – PCP Methaqualone
Heroin	922 – Opiates Reagent
Methamphetamine	923 – Methamphetamine/Ecstasy Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	923 – Methamphetamine/Ecstasy Reagent
Heroin	924 – Mecke's (Modified) Reagent
Diazepam	925 – Valium/Ketamine Reagent
Ketamine	925 – Valium/Ketamine Reagent
Ephedrine	927 – Ephedrine Reagent
gamma – Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)	928 – GHB Reagent
ODV NarcoTest
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Heroin	7602 – Marquis Reagent
Amphetamine	7602 – Marquis Reagent
Methamphetamine	7602 – Marquis Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	7602 – Marquis Reagent
Barbiturates	7605 – Dille-Koppanyi Reagent
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)	7607 – Ehrlich's (Modified) Reagent
Marijuana	7608 – Duquenois Reagent
Hashish Oil	7608 – Duquenois Reagent
Marijuana	7609 – K N Reagent
Hashish Oil	7609 – K N Reagent
Cocaine Hydrochloride	7613 – Scott (Modified) Reagent
Cocaine Base	7613 – Scott (Modified) Reagent
Phencyclidine (PCP)	7614 – PCP Methaqualone Reagent
Heroin	7622 – Opiates Reagent
Methamphetamine	7623– Methamphetamine/Ecstasy Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	7623– Methamphetamine/Ecstasy Reagent
Heroin	7624 – Mecke's Reagent
Diazepam	7625 – Valium/Ketamine Reagent
Ketamine	7625 – Valium/Ketamine Reagent
Ephedrine	7627 – Chen's Reagent - Ephedrine
gamma – Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)	7628 – GHB Reagent
SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LABORATORIES 100 HUNTER PLACE YOUNGSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27596
NARK
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Narcotic Alkaloids	1 – Mayer's Reagent
Heroin	1 – Mayer's Reagent
Morphine	1 – Mayer's Reagent
Amphetamine	1 – Mayer's Reagent
Methamphetamine	1 – Mayer's Reagent
Opium Alkaloids	2 – Marquis Reagent
Heroin	2 – Marquis Reagent
Morphine	2 – Marquis Reagent
Amphetamine	2 – Marquis Reagent
Methamphetamine	2 – Marquis Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	2 – Marquis Reagent
Meperidine (Demerol) (Pethidine)	2 – Marquis Reagent
Heroin	3 – Nitric Acid
Morphine	3 – Nitric Acid
Cocaine Hydrochloride	4 – Cobalt Thiocyanate Reagent
Cocaine Base	4 – Cobalt Thiocyanate Reagent
Procaine	4 – Cobalt Thiocyanate Reagent
Tetracaine	4 – Cobalt Thiocyanate Reagent
Barbiturates	5 – Dille-Koppanyi Reagent
Heroin	6 – Mandelin Reagent
Morphine	6 – Mandelin Reagent
Amphetamine	6 – Mandelin Reagent
Methamphetamine	6 – Mandelin Reagent
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)	7 – Ehrlich's Reagent
Marijuana	8 – Duquenois Reagent
Hashish	8 – Duquenois Reagent
Hashish Oil	8 – Duquenois Reagent
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)	8 – Duquenois Reagent
Marijuana	9 – NDB (Fast Blue B Salt) Reagent
Hashish	9 – NDB (Fast Blue B Salt) Reagent
Hashish Oil	9 – NDB (Fast Blue B Salt) Reagent
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)	9 – NDB (Fast Blue B Salt) Reagent
Cocaine Base	13 – Cobalt Thiocyanate/Crack Test
NARK II
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Narcotic Alkaloids	01 – Marquis Reagent
Heroin	01 – Marquis Reagent
Morphine	01 – Marquis Reagent
Amphetamine	01 – Marquis Reagent
Methamphetamine	01 – Marquis Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	01 – Marquis Reagent
Morphine	02 – Nitric Acid
Heroin	02 – Nitric Acid
Barbiturates	03 – Dille-Koppanyi Reagent
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)	04 – Ehrlich's Reagent
Marijuana	05 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Hashish	05 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Hashish Oil	05 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)	05 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Cocaine Hydrochloride	07 – Scott's (Modified) Reagent
Cocaine Base	07 – Scott's (Modified) Reagent
Phencyclidine (PCP)	09 – Phencyclidine Reagent
Opiates	10 – Opiates Reagent
Heroin	10 – Opiates Reagent
Morphine	10 – Opiates Reagent
Heroin	11 – Mecke's Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	11 – Mecke's Reagent
Pentazocine	12 – Talwin/ Pentazocine Reagent
Ephedrine	13 – Ephedrine Reagent
Diazepam	14 – Valium Reagent
Methamphetamine	15 – Methamphetamine (Secondary Amines Reagent)
Narcotic Alkaloids	19 – Mayer's Reagent
Heroin	19 – Mayer's Reagent
Morphine	19 – Mayer's Reagent
Amphetamine	19 – Mayer's Reagent
Methamphetamine	19 – Mayer's Reagent
3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV)	24 – MDPV (Bath Salts) Reagent
4-Methylmethcathinone (Mephedrone)	25 – Mephedrone (Bath Salts) Reagent
ARMOR HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED 13386 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32218-2383
NIK
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Heroin	Test A 6071 – Marquis Reagent
Amphetamine	Test A 6071 – Marquis Reagent
Methamphetamine	Test A 6071 – Marquis Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	Test A 6071 – Marquis Reagent
Morphine	Test B 6072 – Nitric Acid Reagent
Barbiturates	Test C 6073 – Dille-Koppanyi Reagent
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)	Test D 6074 – LSD Reagent System
Marijuana	Test E 6075 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Hashish Oil	Test E 6075 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Tetrahydrocannabinol	Test E 6075 – Duquenois – Levine Reagent
Cocaine Hydrochloride	Test G 6077 – Scott (Modified) Reagent
Cocaine Base	Test G 6077 – Scott (Modified) Reagent
Cocaine Hydrochloride	6500 or 6501 – Cocaine ID Swab
Cocaine Base	6500 or 6501 – Cocaine ID Swab
Phencyclidine (PCP)	Test J 6079 – PCP Reagent System
Heroin	Test K 6080 – Opiates Reagent
Heroin	Test L 6081 – Brown Heroin Reagent System
gamma – Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)	Test O 6090 – GHB Reagent
Ephedrine	Test Q 6085 – Ephedrine Reagent
Pseudoephedrine	Test Q 6085 – Ephedrine Reagent
Diazepam	Test R 6085 – Valium Reagent
Methamphetamine	Test U 6087 – Methamphetamine Reagent
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	Test U 6087 – Methamphetamine Reagent
Methadone	Test W 6088 – Mandelin Reagent System
MISTRAL SECURITY INCORPORATED 7910 WOODMONT AVENUE SUITE 820 BETHESDA, MARYLAND 20814
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Heroin	Detect 4 Drugs Aerosol
Amphetamine	Detect 4 Drugs Aerosol
Methamphetamine	Detect 4 Drugs Aerosol
Marijuana	Detect 4 Drugs Aerosol
Hashish Oil	Detect 4 Drugs Aerosol
Methamphetamine	Meth 1 and 2 Aerosol
Heroin	Herosol Aerosol
Marijuana	Cannabispray 1 and 2 Aerosol
Hashish Oil	Cannabispray 1 and 2 Aerosol
Cocaine Hydrochloride	Coca-Test Aerosol
Cocaine Base	Coca-Test Aerosol
Marijuana	Pen Test – D4D
Phencyclidine	Pen Test – D4D
Amphetamine	Pen Test – D4D
Ketamine	Pen Test – D4D
Methamphetamine	Pen Test – D4D
Ephedrine	Pen Test – D4D
Heroin	Pen Test – D4D
Methadone	Pen Test – D4D
Buprenorphine	Pen Test – D4D
Opium	Pen Test – D4D
Phenobarbital	Pen Test – Barbitusol
Marijuana	Pen Test – Cannabis Test
Phencyclidine	Pen Test – Coca Test
Cocaine Hydrochloride	Pen Test – Coca Test
Cocaine base	Pen Test – Coca Test
Buprenorphine	Pen Test – C&H Test
Cocaine Hydrochloride	Pen Test – C&H Test
Cocaine base	Pen Test – C&H Test
Ephedrine	Pen Test – C&H Test
Ketamine	Pen Test – C&H Test
Heroin	Pen Test – C&H Test
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)	Pen Test – C&H Test
Methadone	Pen Test – C&H Test
Methamphetamine	Pen Test – C&H Test
Heroin	Pen Test – Herosol
Methadone	Pen Test – Herosol
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide	Pen Test – LSD Test
Methamphetamine	Pen Test – Meth/X Test
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	Pen Test – Meth/X Test
Morphine	Pen Test – Opiatest
Opium	Pen Test – Opiatest
Diazepam	Pen Test – BZO
Ephedrine	Pen Test – Ephedrine
Pseudoephedrine	Pen Test – Ephedrine
JANT PHARMACAL CORPORATION 16255 VENTURA BLVD., #505 ENCINO, CA  91436
Formerly available through: MILLENNIUM SECURITY GROUP
Accutest IDenta
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Marijuana	Marijuana/Hashish (Duquenois-Levine Reagent)
Hashish Oil	Marijuana/Hashish (Duquenois-Levine Reagent)
Heroin	Heroin Step 1 and Step 2
Cocaine Hydrochloride	Cocaine/Crack Step 1 and Step 2
Cocaine Base	Cocaine/Crack Step 1 and Step 2
3,4–Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)	MDMA Step 1 and Step 2
Methamphetamine	Methamphetamine Step 1 and Step 2
COZART PLC 92 MILTON PARK ABINGDON, OXFORDSHIRE ENGLAND OX14 4RY
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Cocaine	Cocaine Solid Field Test
Lynn Peavey Company 10749 West 84th Terrace Lexexa, KS 66214
QuickCheck
Drug or Drug Type:	Manufacturer's Field Test:
Marijuana	Marijuana – 10120
Marijuana	Marijuana – 10121
Hashish Oil	Marijuana – 10120
Hashish Oil	Marijuana – 10121
Heroin	Marquis – 10123
Heroin	Heroin - 10125
Cocaine Hydrochloride	Cocaine – 10124
Cocaine Base	Cocaine – 10124
Methamphetamine	Meth/Ecstasy – 10122
Methamphetamine	Marquis – 10123
MDMA	Meth/Ecstasy – 10122
MDMA	Marquis - 10123

STATE LOTTERY DEPARTMENT

Director's Orders

The following Director's Order of the State Lottery Department was filed with the Virginia Registrar of Regulations on October 6, 2011.

Director's Order Number Eighty-Nine (11)

Certain Virginia Instant Game Lotteries; End of Games.

In accordance with the authority granted by §§ 2.2-4002 B 15 and 58.1-4006 A of the Code of Virginia, I hereby give notice that the following Virginia Lottery instant games will officially end at midnight on October 7, 2011.

Game 1192	Triple Wild (TOP)
Game 1199	Jewel 7's (TOP)
Game 1211	Farm Fresh Fast $500!
Game 1220	$100,000 Riches (TOP)
Game 1231	Fantastic 5's Doubler (TOP)

The last day for lottery retailers to return for credit unsold tickets from any of these games will be November 11, 2011. The last day to redeem winning tickets for any of these games will be April 4, 2012, 180 days from the declared official end of the game. Claims for winning tickets from any of these games will not be accepted after that date. Claims that are mailed and received in an envelope bearing a postmark of the United States Postal Service or another sovereign nation of April 4, 2012, or earlier, will be deemed to have been received on time. This notice amplifies and conforms to the duly adopted State Lottery Board regulations for the conduct of lottery games.

This order is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours at the Virginia Lottery headquarters, 900 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia; and at any Virginia Lottery regional office. A copy may be requested by mail by writing to Director's Office, Virginia Lottery, 900 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

This Director's Order becomes effective on the date of its signing and shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or rescinded by further Director's Order.

/s/ Paula I. Otto
Executive Director
October 6, 2011

* * * * * * * *

The following Director's Orders of the State Lottery Department were filed with the Virginia Registrar of Regulations on October 19, 2011. The orders may be viewed at the State Lottery Department, 900 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, or at the office of the Registrar of Regulations, 910 Capitol Street, 2nd Floor, Richmond, VA.

Director's Order Number Eighty-Eight (11)

Virginia Lottery's "New Year Bonus Sweepstakes" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 19, 2011)

Director's Order Number Ninety (11)

Virginia's Instant Game Lottery 1289; "Crossword" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 19, 2011)

Director's Order Number Ninety-One (11)

Virginia's Instant Game Lottery 1279; "Silver & Gold" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 18, 2011)

Director's Order Number Ninety-Two (11)

Virginia's Instant Game Lottery 1280; "Sweet Treats" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 19, 2011)

Director's Order Number Ninety-Five (11)

Virginia's Instant Game Lottery 1283; "Jingle Bens" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 19, 2011)

Director's Order Number Ninety-Six (11)

Virginia's Instant Game Lottery 1264; "Diamond Dollars" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 18, 2011)

BOARD FOR OPTICIANS

Notice of Periodic Review

Pursuant to Executive Order 14 (2010) and §§ 2.2-4007.1 and 2.2-4017 of the Code of Virginia, the Board for Opticians is conducting a periodic review of 18VAC100-11, Public Participation Guidelines, and 18VAC100-20, Board for Opticians Regulations. The review of the regulations will be guided by the principles in Executive Order 14 (2010) and § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the regulations should be terminated, amended, or retained in their current form.

Public comment is sought on the review of any issue relating to the regulations, including whether the regulations (i) are necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare or for the economical performance of important governmental functions; (ii) minimize the economic impact on small businesses in a manner consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law; and (iii) are clearly written and easily understandable.

The comment period begins November 7, 2011, and ends on November 28, 2011.

Comments may be submitted online to the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall at http://www.townhall.virginia.gov/L/Forums.cfm. Comments may also be sent to William H. Ferguson, II, Executive Director, Board for Opticians, Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 400, Richmond, Virginia 23233, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail]. Comments must include the commenter's name and address (physical or email) information in order to receive a response to the comment from the agency.

Following the close of the public comment period, a report of the periodic review will be posted on the Town Hall and published in the Virginia Register of Regulations.

DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

Small Business Impact Analysis for 22VAC30-11, Public Participation Guidelines

Pursuant to §§ 2.2-4007.1 E and 2.2-4007.1 F of the Code of Virginia, the Department of Rehabilitative Services has conducted a review on 22VAC30-11, Public Participation Guidelines, to determine whether the regulation should be continued without change, amended, or repealed, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law, to minimize the economic impact of regulations on small businesses. Public participation guidelines exist to promote public involvement in the development, amendment or repeal of an agency's regulations. Under § 2.2-4007.02 of the Code of Virginia, every rulemaking body in Virginia is required to adopt public participation guidelines and to use these guidelines in the development of its regulations. The regulation is consistent with the public participation guidelines required of all agencies. The regulation was last evaluated in October 2008, and it remains up to date with existing technology and economic conditions. This regulation should have no direct impact on small businesses. Therefore, it will be retained as is.

Contact Information: Vanessa S. Rakestraw, Policy Analyst, Department of Rehabilitative Services, 8004 Franklin Farms Drive, Richmond, VA 23229, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], TDD [phone], or email [e-mail].

Small Business Impact Analysis for 22VAC30-40, Protection of Participants in Human Research

Pursuant to §§ 2.2-4007.1 E and 2.2-4007.1 F of the Code of Virginia, the Department of Rehabilitative Services has conducted a review on 22VAC30-40, Protection of Participants in Human Research, to determine whether the regulation should be continued without change, amended, or repealed, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law, to minimize the economic impact of regulations on small businesses. A public notice of this was review was issued, but no public comment was received by the department. This regulation provides a basis for the Department of Rehabilitative Services to oversee human subjects research involving the Department of Rehabilitative Services, the Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center, sheltered workshops, and independent living centers. The regulation is needed to protect the health and welfare of humans who receive services from the stated entities and who also may become subjects in human research. Although federal regulations exist to provide these protections, this regulation is required to ensure that oversight for these protections is provided at the state level. The regulation is written to ensure consistency with 45 CFR 46.101 et seq. The existing regulation was last reviewed in July 2009. Technology has resulted in existing research data being easily accessible by those who intend to conduct secondary data research. In addition, economic conditions make such data that can be acquired inexpensively more desirable to researchers. Research is typically conducted by those in academic, medical, or government settings. Small businesses do not usually engage in research using human subjects from the Department of Rehabilitative Services, the Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center, sheltered workshops, and independent living centers. However, if a small business is interested in conducting such research, this regulation provides a protocol for the small business to follow. Thus, this regulations remains an important process in the protecting the welfare of human subjects.

Contact Information: Vanessa S. Rakestraw, Policy Analyst, Department of Rehabilitative Services, 8004 Franklin Farms Drive, Richmond, VA 23229, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], TDD [phone].

STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD

Proposed Consent Order for Loudoun County Sanitation Authority

An enforcement action has been proposed for the Loudoun County Sanitation Authority for alleged violations in Loudoun County at the Courtland Rural Village Water Reclamation Facility. The proposed consent order describes a settlement of violations of Virginia Pollutant Abatement Permit No. VPA00010. A description of the proposed action is available at the Department of Environmental Quality office named below or online at www.deq.virginia.gov. Sarah Baker will accept comments by email at [e-mail], FAX (703) 583-3821, or postal mail, Department of Environmental Quality, Northern Regional Office, 13901 Crown Court, Woodbridge, VA 22193, from November 7, 2011, through December 7, 2011.

Proposed Enforcement Action for Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power

An enforcement action has been proposed for Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power for alleged violations of the State Water Control Law concerning the unauthorized discharge of oil to state lands in York County. A description of the proposed action is available at the DEQ office named below or online at www.deq.virginia.gov. Paul R. Smith will accept comments by email at [e-mail], FAX (757) 518-2009, or postal mail Department of Environmental Quality, Tidewater Regional Office, 5636 Southern Blvd., Virginia Beach, VA 23462, from November 7, 2011, to December 7, 2011.

VIRGINIA CODE COMMISSION

Notice to State Agencies

Contact Information: Mailing Address: Virginia Code Commission, 910 Capitol Street, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, VA 23219; Telephone: Voice [phone]; FAX [phone]; Email: [e-mail].

Meeting Notices: Section 2.2-3707 C of the Code of Virginia requires state agencies to post meeting notices on their websites and on the Commonwealth Calendar at http://www.virginia.gov/cmsportal3/cgi-bin/calendar.cgi.

Cumulative Table of Virginia Administrative Code Sections Adopted, Amended, or Repealed: A table listing regulation sections that have been amended, added, or repealed in the Virginia Register of Regulations since the regulations were originally published or last supplemented in the print version of the Virginia Administrative Code is available at http://register.dls.virginia.gov/cumultab.htm.

Filing Material for Publication in the Virginia Register of Regulations: Agencies are required to use the Regulation Information System (RIS) when filing regulations for publication in the Virginia Register of Regulations. The Registrar's office works closely with the Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) to coordinate the system with the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall. RIS and Town Hall complement and enhance one another by sharing pertinent regulatory information.