8 General Notices/Errata

GENERAL NOTICES/ERRATA

Vol. 28 Iss. 6 - November 21, 2011

GENERAL NOTICES/ERRATA

STATE BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

Notice of Periodic Review

Pursuant to Executive Order 14 (2010) and §§ 2.2-4007.1 and 2.2-4017 of the Code of Virginia, the State Board of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services is conducting a periodic review of 12VAC35-115, Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals Receiving Services from Providers of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services. The review of this regulation will be guided by the principles in Executive Order 14 (2010) and § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia. The purpose of this review is to determine whether this regulation should be terminated, amended, or retained in its current form.

Public comment is sought on the review of any issue relating to this regulation, including whether the regulation (i) is necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare or for the economical performance of important governmental functions; (ii) minimizes the economic impact on small businesses in a manner consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law; and (iii) is clearly written and easily understandable.

The comment period begins November 21, 2011, and ends on December 19, 2011.

Comments may be submitted online to the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall at http://www.townhall.virginia.gov/L/Forums.cfm. Comments may also be sent to Margaret Walsh, State Human Rights Director, State Board of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services, 1220 Bank Street, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail].

Comments must include the commenter's name and address (physical or email) information in order to receive a response to the comment from the agency. Following the close of the public comment period, a report of the periodic review will be posted on the Town Hall and published in the Virginia Register of Regulations.

Notice of Periodic Review

Pursuant to Executive Order 14 (2010) and §§ 2.2-4007.1 and 2.2-4017 of the Code of Virginia, the State Board of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services is conducting a periodic review of 12VAC35-210, Regulations to Govern Temporary Leave from State Mental Health and Mental Retardation Facilities. The review of this regulation will be guided by the principles in Executive Order 14 (2010) and § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia. The purpose of this review is to determine whether this regulation should be terminated, amended, or retained in its current form.

Public comment is sought on the review of any issue relating to this regulation, including whether the regulation (i) is necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare or for the economical performance of important governmental functions; (ii) minimizes the economic impact on small businesses in a manner consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law; and (iii) is clearly written and easily understandable.

The comment period begins November 21, 2011, and ends on December 19, 2011.

Comments may be submitted online to the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall at http://www.townhall.virginia.gov/L/Forums.cfm. Comments may also be sent to Linda Grasewicz, Regulatory Coordinator, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services, 1220 Bank Street, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone [phone], FAX (804) 371-0092, or email [e-mail].

Comments must include the commenter's name and address (physical or email) information in order to receive a response to the comment from the agency. Following the close of the public comment period, a report of the periodic review will be posted on the Town Hall and published in the Virginia Register of Regulations.

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION

Bureau of Insurance

October 25, 2011

Administrative Letter 2011-07

To: All Property and Casualty Insurers and Rate Service Organizations Licensed in Virginia

Re: Rate Service Organizations - Advisory Filings

The Bureau of Insurance (Bureau) is announcing that, effective immediately, Rate Service Organizations (RSOs) will be permitted to submit Advisory Filings in addition to filing forms and supplementary rate information on behalf of insurers that are members or subscribers of the RSO ("participating insurers").

In order to administer the filing and adoption of Advisory Filings, the Bureau has established a process for RSOs and insurers to follow, which is outlined below:

•  An RSO may identify certain products or programs that it elects not to "file on behalf of" its participating insurers. Instead, the RSO will be permitted to submit an Advisory Filing for any product or program that will allow the filing to be available for use by the RSO's participating insurers.

•  Advisory Filings will not include an effective date or implementation date. The Bureau will acknowledge an Advisory Filing with a disposition date, which is the earliest date that the filing may be adopted by the RSO's participating insurer.  Adoption instructions will be provided by the RSO.

•  Participating insurers must independently determine whether to adopt an Advisory Filing.

•  If a participating insurer decides to adopt the Advisory Filing, the insurer must notify the Bureau on or before the insurer's implementation/effective date of the materials in the Advisory Filing.

•  The participating insurer's notification of adoption of the Advisory Filing must include the following information:

1. The RSO's Advisory Filing Number(s);

2. The insurer's proposed implementation/effective date; and

3. Any other information necessary for implementation of the product or program.

•  The Bureau has established an Advisory Filing Adoption Form (AFAF-1 10/2011) outlining the information that will be required when an RSO's participating insurer decides to adopt an Advisory Filing. Insurers are required to use this form.

The following list of questions and answers provides guidance regarding adoption of an RSO's Advisory Filing(s):

1. Will an insurer that is not a participating insurer of an RSO be allowed to adopt an RSO's Advisory Filing?

No.

2. Will RSOs still be allowed to "file on behalf of" their participating insurers?

Yes. It is important to note that no changes are being made to the "file on behalf of" process that RSOs currently utilize.

3. Can a participating insurer use the adoption process outlined in this administrative letter to adopt materials that were submitted by an RSO on a "file on behalf of" basis?

No. This adoption process is only available for a filing that an RSO has submitted on an advisory basis.

4. What information is important for an RSO's participating insurer to know regarding the difference(s) between an RSO's "file on behalf of" filing and an RSO's Advisory Filing?

With regard to "file on behalf of" filings:

If a participating insurer has authorized an RSO to file forms and/or supplementary rate information on its behalf for a line or program, the insurer is not required to notify the Bureau of its intentions to use the submission unless the insurer intends to take exception to the implementation date or the content of the submission.

With regard to the adoption of an Advisory Filing:

The only way that a participating insurer can adopt an Advisory Filing is for the insurer to take specific and necessary actions, which include (i) notifying the Bureau of the insurer's intention to adopt the Advisory Filing, (ii) providing the RSO's Advisory Filing Number, and (iii) providing an implementation/effective date for implementation of the Advisory Filing.  The insurer's submission of properly completed Advisory Filing Adoption Form (AFAF-1 10/2011) will be sufficient to satisfy the insurer's obligation to comply with the filing requirements set forth in § 38.2-317 for forms and § 38.2-1906 for supplementary rate information.

It is important to note that an insurer's failure to comply with the applicable filing requirements as stated above may result in penalties as set forth in § 38.2-218 of the Code of Virginia.

1. How will a participating insurer know whether a filing has been submitted as "file on behalf of" versus filed as an Advisory Filing?

In the information that is distributed to their participating insurers, RSOs must clearly distinguish between submissions that are "file on behalf of" and those that are submitted as an Advisory Filing.

2. Will this process affect the filing of advisory loss costs by an RSO?

No. Administrative Letter 2005-3 (workers' compensation loss costs) and Administrative Letter 2006-16 (other than workers' compensation loss costs) apply to advisory loss costs.

3. Are participating insurers required to notify the Bureau if they intend to adopt subsequent revisions to an Advisory Filing?

Yes. Participating insurers must notify the Bureau and provide an implementation/effective date every time they decide to adopt an RSO's Advisory Filing or any subsequent revisions to an Advisory Filing.

Questions regarding this letter may be directed to the Property and Casualty Division's Rates and Forms Sections at:

Personal Lines: Rebecca Nichols, CPCU, CIC, CIE, AIC, CCP, ALMI, Principal Insurance Market Examiner, telephone [phone], or email [e-mail].

Commercial Multi-Lines: Betty Branum, CPCU, CIC, Principal Insurance Market Examiner, telephone [phone], or email [e-mail].

Commercial Casualty: Melinda Willis, CPCU, CIE, AIC, ALMI, Principal Insurance Market Examiner, telephone [phone], or email [e-mail].

Jacqueline K. Cunningham
Commissioner of Insurance

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Total Maximum Daily Load for Lower Banister River

The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) seek written and oral comments from interested persons on the development of an implementation plan (IP) for bacteria total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) on a 13.18 miles segment of the Lower Banister River from Elkhorn Creek to Banister Lake, the entire 9.66 miles of Polecat Creek, and 11.78 miles of Sandy Creek from Johns Run to its mouth. These portions of the Banister River watershed are located in Halifax County, including the Town of Halifax. The TMDL study for these stream impairments was completed in November, 2007, and can be found in the Bacteria TMDLs for Banister River, Bearskin Creek, Cherrystone Creek, Polecat Creek, Stinking River, Sandy Creek, and Whitethorn Creek Watersheds study report on DEQ's website at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/tmdl/apptmdls/roankrvr/banister.pdf.

Section 62.1-44.19:7 C of the Code of Virginia requires the development of an IP for approved TMDLs. The IP should provide measurable goals and the date of expected achievement of water quality objectives. The IP should also include the corrective actions needed and their associated costs, benefits, and environmental impacts.

The first public meetings to discuss the development of the IP for the bacteria TMDLs will be held on Tuesday, November 29, 2011, at 7 p.m. at the Virginia Extension Office, USDA Farm Services Building, 171 South Main Street, Halifax, VA 24558. At this meeting, development of the implementation plan will be discussed and citizens will learn how they can be part of the public participation process.

The 30-day public comment period on the information presented at the meeting will end on December 29, 2011. A fact sheet on the development of the IP is available upon request. Questions or information requests should be addressed to Eileen Rowan with the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. Written comments and inquiries should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person submitting the comments and should be sent to Eileen Rowan, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, 8 Radford Street, Suite 102A, Christiansburg, VA 24073, email [e-mail], telephone [phone].

Water Quality in the North Fork Holston River - Hiltons, Virginia

Announcement of an effort to restore water quality in the North Fork Holston River and the following tributaries: Lick Creek, Beaver Creek, Laurel Creek, Locust Cove Creek, Robertson Branch, Turkey Run Creek, Logan Creek, Toole Creek, Tumbling Creek, Wolf Creek, Burmley Creek, Cove Creek, Abrams Creek, Little Moccasin Creek, Nordyke Creek, Smith Creek, Blue Springs Branch, Dowell Branch, Hilton Creek, Possum Creek, and Big Moccasin Creek in Bland, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, and Scott Counties, Virginia.

Public meeting location: Hiltons Elementary School, 303 Academy Road, in Hiltons, Virginia on December 6, 2011, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Purpose of notice: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Department of Conservation and Recreation are announcing an effort to restore water quality, a public comment opportunity, and public meeting.

Meeting description: First public meeting on a study to restore water quality.

Description of study: DEQ has been working to identify sources of bacterial contamination and sources of pollutants affecting aquatic organisms. The mainstem of the North Fork Holston River in Bland, Smyth, Washington, and Scott Counties is impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Lick Creek, Beaver Creek, Locust Cove Creek, Robertson Branch, Turkey Run Creek, and Tumbling Creek in Smyth County, as well as Laurel Creek in Smyth, Bland, and Tazewell Counties are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Logan Creek, Toole Creek, Wolf Creek, Brumley Creek, Abrams Creek, Little Moccasin Creek, Nordyke Creek, and Smith Creek in Washington County, as well as Cove Creek and Big Moccasin Creek in Scott and Washington Counties are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Blue Springs Branch, Dowell Branch, Hilton Creek, and Possum Creek in Scott County are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Lick Creek, Laurel Creek, and the North Fork Holston River from the Cove Creek confluence downstream to the Tennessee state line are impaired for failing to meet the aquatic life use (benthic impairment) based on violations of the general standard for aquatic organisms. Laurel Creek is also impaired for failure to meet the aquatic life use based on violations of the temperature water quality standard.

During the study, DEQ will determine the sources of bacterial contamination and pollutants impairing the aquatic community will be identified and total maximum daily loads (TMDL) developed for the impaired waters. To restore water quality, contamination levels must be reduced to the TMDL amount. A TMDL is the total amount of a pollutant a water body can contain and still meet water quality standards.

How a decision is made: The development of a TMDL includes public meetings and a public comment period once the study report is drafted. After public comments have been considered and addressed, DEQ will submit the TMDL report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for approval.

How to comment: DEQ accepts written comments by email, fax, or postal mail. Written comments should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person commenting and be received by DEQ during the comment period, December 6, 2011, to January 6, 2012. DEQ also accepts written and oral comments at the public meeting announced in this notice.

To review fact sheets: Fact sheets are available on the impaired waters from the contacts below or on the DEQ website at www.deq.virginia.gov/tmdl.

Contact for additional information: Martha Chapman, TMDL Coordinator, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Southwest Regional Office, 355 Deadmore Street, P.O. Box 1688, Abingdon, VA 24212-1688, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail].

Water Quality in the North Fork Holston River - Saltville, Virginia

Announcement of an effort to restore water quality in the North Fork Holston River and the following tributaries: Lick Creek, Beaver Creek, Laurel Creek, Locust Cove Creek, Robertson Branch, Turkey Run Creek, Logan Creek, Toole Creek, Tumbling Creek, Wolf Creek, Burmley Creek, Cove Creek, Abrams Creek, Little Moccasin Creek, Nordyke Creek, Smith Creek, Blue Springs Branch, Dowell Branch, Hilton Creek, Possum Creek, and Big Moccasin Creek in Bland, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, and Scott Counties, Virginia.

Public meeting location: Friends Community Church, 145 Palmer Avenue, in Saltville, Virginia on December 1, 2011, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Purpose of notice: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Department of Conservation and Recreation are announcing an effort to restore water quality, a public comment opportunity, and public meeting.

Meeting description: First public meeting on a study to restore water quality.

Description of study: DEQ has been working to identify sources of bacterial contamination and sources of pollutants affecting aquatic organisms. The mainstem of the North Fork Holston River in Bland, Smyth, Washington, and Scott Counties is impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Lick Creek, Beaver Creek, Locust Cove Creek, Robertson Branch, Turkey Run Creek, and Tumbling Creek in Smyth County, as well as Laurel Creek in Smyth, Bland, and Tazewell Counties are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Logan Creek, Toole Creek, Wolf Creek, Brumley Creek Abrams Creek, Little Moccasin Creek, Nordyke Creek, and Smith Creek in Washington County, as well as Cove Creek and Big Moccasin Creek in Scott and Washington Counties are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard.  Blue Springs Branch, Dowell Branch, Hilton Creek, and Possum Creek in Scott County are impaired for failure to meet the recreational use because of fecal coliform bacteria violations and violations of the E. coli standard. Lick Creek, Laurel Creek, and the North Fork Holston River from the Cove Creek confluence downstream to the Tennessee state line are impaired for failing to meet the aquatic life use (benthic impairment) based on violations of the general standard for aquatic organisms. Laurel Creek is also impaired for failure to meet the aquatic life use based on violations of the temperature water quality standard.

During the study, DEQ will determine the sources of bacterial contamination and pollutants impairing the aquatic community will be identified and total maximum daily loads (TMDL) developed for the impaired waters. To restore water quality, contamination levels must be reduced to the TMDL amount. A TMDL is the total amount of a pollutant a water body can contain and still meet water quality standards.

How a decision is made: The development of a TMDL includes public meetings and a public comment period once the study report is drafted. After public comments have been considered and addressed, DEQ will submit the TMDL report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for approval.

How to comment: DEQ accepts written comments by email, fax, or postal mail. Written comments should include the name, address, and telephone number of the person commenting and be received by DEQ during the comment period, December 1, 2011, to January 3, 2012. DEQ also accepts written and oral comments at the public meeting announced in this notice.

To review fact sheets: Fact sheets are available on the impaired waters from the contacts below or on the DEQ website at www.deq.virginia.gov/tmdl.

Contact for additional information: Martha Chapman, TMDL Coordinator, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Southwest Regional Office, 355 Deadmore Street, P.O. Box 1688, Abingdon, VA 24212-1688, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail].

BOARD OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS

Notice of Periodic Review

Pursuant to Executive Order 14 (2010) and §§ 2.2-4007.1 and 2.2-4017 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Health Professions is currently reviewing each of the regulations listed below to determine whether the regulations should be terminated, amended, or retained in their current form. The review of the regulations will be guided by the principles in Executive Order 14 (2010) and § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia. Each regulation will be reviewed to determine whether the regulations (i) are necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare or for the economical performance of important governmental functions; (ii) minimize the economic impact on small businesses in a manner consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law; and (iii) are clearly written and easily understandable.

18VAC75-20, Regulations Governing Practitioner Self-Referral

18VAC75-30, Regulations Governing Standards for Dietitians and Nutritionists

18VAC75-40, Regulations Governing Certification of Dialysis Technicians

The comment period begins on November 21, 2011, and ends on January 20, 2012. Comments may be submitted online to the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall at http://www.townhall.virginia.gov/L/Forums.cfm. Comments may also be sent to Elaine J. Yeatts, Agency Regulatory Coordinator, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Henrico, VA 23233, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail]. Comments must include the commenter's name and address information (physical or email) in order to receive a response to the comment from the agency.

Following the close of the public comment period, a report of the periodic review will be posted on the Town Hall and published in the Virginia Register of Regulations.

STATE LOTTERY DEPARTMENT

Director's Orders

The following Director's Orders of the State Lottery Department were filed with the Virginia Registrar of Regulations on October 31, 2011. The orders may be viewed at the State Lottery Department, 900 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, or at the office of the Registrar of Regulations, 910 Capitol Street, 2nd Floor, Richmond, VA.

Director's Order Number Ninety-Seven (11)

Virginia Lottery's "Holiday Subscriptions Sweepstakes" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 27, 2011)

Director's Order Number Ninety-Eight (11)

Virginia's Instant Game Lottery 1285; "Straight 9'S Tripler" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 28, 2011)

Director's Order Number One Hundred (11)

Virginia's On-Line Game "Virginia's New Year Millionaire Raffle" Final Rules for Game Operation (effective on October 28, 2011)

DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

Small Business Impact Analysis for 22VAC30-30, Provision of Independent Living Rehabilitation Services

Pursuant to §§ 2.2-4007.1 E and 2.2-4007.1 F of the Code of Virginia, the Department of Rehabilitative Services has conducted a review of 22VAC30-30, Provision of Independent Living Rehabilitation Services, to determine whether the regulation should be continued without change, amended, or repealed, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable law, to minimize the economic impact of regulations on small businesses. A public notice of this was review was issued, but no public comment was received by the department. This regulation is needed to govern the provision of independent living services. The regulation has been written to be consistent with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and with 34 CFR Part 364, 34 CFR Part 365, and 34 CFR Part 366. This regulation was last reviewed in September 2008. At that time, the State Independent Living Council and directors of Centers for Independent Living reviewed the proposed amendments and indicated the regulation was clearly written and easily understandable. The regulation has no economic impact on small businesses. Thus, the regulation will be retained as is.

Contact Information: Vanessa S. Rakestraw, Policy Analyst, Department of Rehabilitative Services, 8004 Franklin Farms Drive, Richmond, VA 23229, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], TDD (800) 464-9950, or email [e-mail].

Small Business Impact Analysis for 22VAC30-50, Policies and Procedures for Administering Commonwealth Neurotrauma Initiative Trust Fund

Pursuant to §§ 2.2-4007.1 E and 2.2-4007.1 F of the Code of Virginia, the Department of Rehabilitative Services has conducted a review of 22VAC30-50, Policies and Procedures for Administering Commonwealth Neurotrauma Initiative Trust Fund. This regulation is needed in order to provide policies and procedures for the administration of the Commonwealth Neurotrauma Initiative Trust Fund and for the awarding of trust fund monies to the specific entities for the research and treatment of neurotrauma. The specific entities are Virginia based organizations, institutions and researchers that must apply and be qualified to receive these funds. The department has collaborated with the Board of the Commonwealth Neurotrauma Initiative Trust Fund in an effort to develop regulations that are simple and easy to understand. Some board members are trained and employed in the field of neurotrauma; therefore, they are familiar with the language utilized in this professional field. Board members continue to advise the department during periodic reviews of this regulation.

This regulation governs the awarding of trust fund monies to specific entities for basic science and clinical research on the mechanisms and treatment of neurotrauma, and for community-based rehabilitative services for individuals with traumatic spinal cord or brain injuries. It does not appear that this regulation overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with any existing state or federal regulation.

This regulation was reviewed in May of 2007 and was revised in August of 2009. There have been no significant changes in technology, economic conditions, or other factors that would affect this regulation.

The regulation does not impact small businesses in Virginia unless the business provides research on the mechanisms and treatment of neurotrauma or community based rehabilitative services for individuals with traumatic spinal cord or brain injuries. If a small business does conduct research in this field or provide community based rehabilitative services, the regulation would have a positive impact by providing a means by which a small business could apply for short-term funding to conduct research or develop rehabilitative services.

Contact Information: Vanessa S. Rakestraw, Policy Analyst, Department of Rehabilitative Services, 8004 Franklin Farms Drive, Richmond, VA 23229, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], TDD [phone], or email [e-mail].

VIRGINIA CODE COMMISSION

Notice to State Agencies

Contact Information: Mailing Address: Virginia Code Commission, 910 Capitol Street, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, VA 23219; Telephone: Voice [phone]; FAX [phone]; Email: [e-mail].

Meeting Notices: Section 2.2-3707 C of the Code of Virginia requires state agencies to post meeting notices on their websites and on the Commonwealth Calendar at http://www.virginia.gov/cmsportal3/cgi-bin/calendar.cgi.

Cumulative Table of Virginia Administrative Code Sections Adopted, Amended, or Repealed: A table listing regulation sections that have been amended, added, or repealed in the Virginia Register of Regulations since the regulations were originally published or last supplemented in the print version of the Virginia Administrative Code is available at http://register.dls.virginia.gov/cumultab.htm.

Filing Material for Publication in the Virginia Register of Regulations: Agencies are required to use the Regulation Information System (RIS) when filing regulations for publication in the Virginia Register of Regulations. The Office of the Virginia Register of Regulations implemented a web-based application called RIS for filing regulations and related items for publication in the Virginia Register. The Registrar's office has worked closely with the Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) to coordinate the system with the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall. RIS and Town Hall complement and enhance one another by sharing pertinent regulatory information.

ERRATA

STATE BOARD OF HEALTH

Title of Regulation: 12VAC5-613. Regulations for Alternative Onsite Sewage Systems (adding 12VAC5-613-10 through 12VAC5-613-210).

Publication: 28:5 VA.R. 458-472 November 7, 2011.

Correction to Final Regulation:

Page 467, 12VAC5-613-100 B, line 4, change "12VAC5-610-90 or 12VAC5-610-210" to "12VAC5-613-90 or 12VAC5-613-210"

VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2164; Filed November 2, 2011, 2:21 p.m.