2VAC5-180 Rules and Regulations Governing Pseudorabies in Virginia

REGULATIONS

Vol. 32 Iss. 3 - October 05, 2015

TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE

BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES

Chapter 180

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 2VAC5-180. Rules and Regulations Governing Pseudorabies in Virginia (repealing 2VAC5-180-10 through 2VAC5-180-120).

Statutory Authority: §§ 3.2-6001, 3.2-6002, and 3.2-6004 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearings are scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: November 4, 2015.

Effective Date: November 19, 2015.

Agency Contact: Charles Broaddus, D.V.M., Program Manager, Veterinary Services, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone [phone], FAX (804) 371-2380, TTY [phone], or email [e-mail].

Basis: Section 3.2-109 of the Code of Virginia establishes the Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services as a policy board with the authority to adopt regulations in accordance with the provisions of Title 3.2 of the Code of Virginia. Section 3.2-6001 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the board and the State Veterinarian to protect livestock and poultry from contagious and infectious disease. Section 3.2-6002 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the board to adopt regulations to prevent the spread of and eradicate contagious and infectious livestock and poultry diseases.

Purpose: This regulation was developed and used during the successful eradication efforts for pseudorabies in swine. The regulation is now outdated. The tests and programs included in the regulation have not been utilized in at least 15 years. As such, this regulation is no longer needed. If pseudorabies returns to Virginia, the agency has the ability to manage disease outbreaks and quarantine animals under statutory authority.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Process: As pseudorabies has not been detected in swine in Virginia since the 1980s, a need for this regulation no longer exists. The agency is not aware of any stakeholders suggesting that the regulation be retained or that the regulation is of any benefit to them.

Substance: Due to the eradication of pseudorabies from commercial swine in Virginia, this regulation is no longer needed. Therefore, the agency proposes to repeal the regulation.

Issues: The primary advantage to the public in repealing the regulation is that there would no longer be an outdated regulation that specifies actions that are no longer taken. The agency and Commonwealth will no longer be in a position of having an outdated regulation that is not enforced. This action is part of good governance in that an outdated, unnecessary regulation will be eliminated. There are no disadvantages to the public or the Commonwealth associated with repealing the regulation.

Small Business Impact Review Report of Findings: This regulatory action serves as the report of the findings of the regulatory review pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Board) proposes to repeal this regulation.

Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for all proposed changes.

Estimated Economic Impact. The existing regulation provides the framework for the eradication of pseudorabies in Virginia swine. Pseudorabies is an infectious disease of swine, and it can also affect other domestic animals. Pseudorabies was common in swine in much of the 20th century but through a structured and effective program it has been eradicated from commercial swine in the United States. Through the testing of swine, removal of those swine found to be positive for pseudorabies, and vaccination of susceptible populations, as required in the regulation, pseudorabies was eradicated from Virginia, with the last known case occurring in the 1980s.

According to the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS), since pseudorabies in swine was eradicated the tests and programs included in the regulation have not been utilized in at least 15 years. If pseudorabies returns to the Commonwealth, VDACS has the ability to manage disease outbreaks and quarantine animals under statutory authority. Thus, repealing this regulation will have no impact beyond the benefit of decreasing the chance that readers of the regulation would be misled concerning current requirements. Therefore the proposed repeal of the regulation will produce a small net benefit.

Businesses and Entities Affected. Repealing this regulation will have no impact beyond decreasing the likelihood that readers of the regulation would be misled concerning current requirements. When the regulation was utilized, it affected persons, farms and firms who owned, shipped, sold, lent, leased or traded swine in Virginia.

Localities Particularly Affected. The proposed repeal of this regulation does not disproportionately affect particular localities.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed repeal of this regulation does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed repeal of this regulation does not significantly affect private property.

Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. The proposed repeal of this regulation does not affect costs for small businesses.

Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact. The proposed amendments will not adversely affect small businesses.

Real Estate Development Costs. The proposed amendments are unlikely to affect real estate development costs.

Legal Mandate. General: The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order Number 17 (2014). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the report should include but not be limited to:

• the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply,

• the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected,

• the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected,

• the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and

• the impact on the use and value of private property.

Small Businesses: If the proposed regulatory action will have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include:

• an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation,

• the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents,

• a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and

• a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation.

Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules is notified at the time the proposed regulation is submitted to the Virginia Register of Regulations for publication. This analysis shall represent DPB's best estimate for the purposes of public review and comment on the proposed regulation.

Agency's Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services concurs with the analysis.

Summary:

This regulatory action repeals the regulation, which is outdated and no longer necessary due to the successful eradication of pseudorabies in commercial swine in Virginia.

VA.R. Doc. No. R16-4285; Filed September 8, 2015, 12:12 p.m.