18VAC85-120 Regulations Governing the Licensure of Athletic Trainers

REGULATIONS

Vol. 27 Iss. 10 - January 17, 2011

TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING

BOARD OF MEDICINE

Chapter 120

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 18VAC85-120. Regulations Governing the Licensure of Athletic Trainers (amending 18VAC85-120-80).

Statutory Authority: §§ 54.1-2400 and 54.1-2957.4 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearings are scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: February 16, 2011.

Effective Date: March 3, 2011.

Agency Contact: William L. Harp, M.D., Executive Director, Board of Medicine, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23233, telephone [phone], FAX [phone], or email [e-mail].

Basis: Section 54.1-2400 of the Code of Virginia provides the Board of Medicine the authority to promulgate regulations to administer the regulatory system. The specific legal authority to promulgate the regulation for provisional licensure of athletic trainers is found in § 54.1-2957.4 of the Code of Virginia.

Purpose: The purpose of the proposed action is to limit the length of time a person can practice athletic training under a provisional license since that person has not demonstrated minimal competency by passage of the examination. The intent of a provisional license was to allow applicants to begin employment between the time they completed school and received the results of the certification examination, and six months is more than sufficient time to complete the examination and become licensed.

While provisional licensees are supposed to practice under close supervision, it has been reported that some are practicing with very little oversight. In addition to the length of time for practice with a provisional license (12 months), the current regulations allow persons who have failed the examination to continue practicing even though they have demonstrated that they are not minimally competent. Because the current regulation for provisional licensure may not adequately protect the athletes (typically young people) who are receiving important care and advice on injuries and training, the board has determined that the regulation should be amended under a fast-track process.

The option of an internship approved by National Athletic Trainers' Association Board of Certification (NATABOC) instead of graduation from an educational program no longer exists and is eliminated to avoid confusion.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Process: The fast-track process is being used to facilitate the changes as soon as feasible because of concerns in the athletic training profession about provisional licensees continuing to practice after failing the examination, which is an indication that they are not minimally competent.

The advisory board is unanimous in its recommendation for this change, and the limitation of six months on a provisional license is consistent with other professions such as occupational therapy.

Substance: Subsection C of 18VAC85-120-80 on provisional licensure is amended to: (i) eliminate the reference to an internship approved by NATABOC and (ii) change the term of a provisional license for athletic trainers from one year to six months from issuance and to add that the license expires upon receipt of notification of a failing score on the NATABOC certification examination or upon licensure as an athletic trainer by the board, whichever comes first.

Issues: The advantage to the public is more assurance that persons practicing as athletic trainers and providing athletes (typically young people) with crucial care and advice on injuries and training are minimally competent. There are no disadvantages to the public.

There are no advantages or disadvantages to the agency or the Commonwealth.

Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The Board of Medicine (Board) proposes to amend its Regulations Governing the Licensure of Athletic Trainers to eliminate reference to a now defunct internship program, change the time limit for provisional licensure from one year to six months, and specify that individuals who fail their licensure exam while provisionally licensed will lose that license upon notification of their failure.

Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for two of the proposed regulatory changes. There is insufficient information to ascertain whether benefits would likely outweigh costs for an additional amendment of regulatory requirements.

Estimated Economic Impact. Current regulations for licensure of athletic trainers allow individuals who have either graduated from an accredited education program, or who have fulfilled internship educational requirements through the National Athletic Trainers Association Board of Certification (NATABOC), to be provisionally licensed for one year while they are either waiting to take their licensure exam or are waiting for their results. While provisionally licensed, individuals have to work under the supervision of a fully licensed athletic trainer. The Board believes that, despite this supervision requirement, provisionally licensed individuals are working with very little oversight. Specifically, Board staff reports that supervision, in some cases, has consisted of only telephonic contact once a day.

While the Board knows of no specific instances of patients being harmed by loose supervision practices, they believe that the chances of harm occurring will be further minimized by amending these regulations so that provisional licenses will be valid for not more than six months and so that individuals who fail their licensure exams will automatically lose their provisional licenses (upon notification from the testing authority that they have failed). To the extent that licensure in this field helps to ensure safety, clients of athletic trainers will likely benefit from these regulatory changes; particularly from the added provision for individuals who fail their competency exams to automatically lose their provisional licenses. Some small number of individuals who would be provisionally licensed in the future will likely bear some costs from only being able to keep that license for six months rather that the year that is currently allowed. These costs would likely include job loss for individuals who do not take, and pass, their competency exam within six months of finishing their education. Whether benefits outweigh costs for decreasing the maximum length of provisional licensure will depend on whether the harm that might be caused by people practicing under provisional licensure for an additional six months is greater than the loss of work opportunity for individuals who would lose their provisional license after six months rather than a year. Four of the eight individuals who currently hold a provisional license have had that license for more than six months.

The Board also proposes to eliminate reference currently to the NATABOC internship program that no longer exists. No individual is likely to incur costs from obsolete language being removed from these regulations. This change will benefit anyone who might have been confused by the reference to licensure through a program that is currently not available.

Businesses and Entities Affected. Individuals who are working to attain athletic trainer licensure will be affected by these regulatory changes. The Department of Health Professions (DHP) reports that 119 athletic trainers were newly licensed in 2009 and that there are currently eight individuals who are provisionally licensed as athletic trainers. Four of those eight individuals have been provisionally licensed for longer than six months and would, therefore, be adversely affected if these new regulatory provisions were already in place.

Localities Particularly Affected. No locality will be particularly affected by this proposed regulatory action.

Projected Impact on Employment. This regulatory action will likely have only a very minimal impact on employment in the Commonwealth.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. This regulatory action will likely have no effect on the use or value of private property in the Commonwealth.

Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. Small businesses in the Commonwealth are unlikely to incur any costs on account of this regulatory action.

Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact. Small businesses in the Commonwealth are unlikely to incur any costs on account of this regulatory action.

Real Estate Development Costs. This regulatory action will likely have no effect on real estate development costs in the Commonwealth.

Legal Mandate. The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Administrative Process Act and Executive Order Number 36 (06). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include, but need not be limited to, the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the regulation would apply, the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and the impact on the use and value of private property. Further, if the proposed regulation has adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include (i) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the regulation; (ii) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents; (iii) a statement of the probable effect of the regulation on affected small businesses; and (iv) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the regulation. The analysis presented above represents DPB's best estimate of these economic impacts.

Agency's Response to the Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis: The Board of Medicine concurs with the analysis of the Department of Planning and Budget for proposed regulations, 18VAC85-120, relating to changes to provisional licensure.

Summary:

Subsection C of 18VAC85-120-80 on provisional licensure is amended to (i) eliminate the reference to an obsolete internship of the National Athletic Trainers' Association Board of Certification (NATABOC) and (ii) change the term of a provisional license for athletic trainers from one year to six months from issuance and to add that the license expires upon receipt of notification of a failing score on the NATABOC certification examination or upon licensure as an athletic trainer by the board, whichever comes first.

18VAC85-120-80. Provisional licensure.

A. An applicant who is a graduate of an accredited education program or has fulfilled internship educational requirements through NATABOC and who has applied to take the certification examination may be granted a provisional license to practice athletic training under the supervision and control of an athletic trainer.

B. The graduate shall submit an application for a provisional license to the board for review and approval by the Chair of the Advisory Board on Athletic Training or his designee.

C. The provisional license shall expire one year six months from issuance or upon receipt of notification of a failing score on the NATABOC certification examination or upon licensure as an athletic trainer by the board, whichever comes first.

VA.R. Doc. No. R11-2370; Filed December 21, 2010, 12:55 p.m.