Section 200. PASARR evaluation criteria  


Latest version.
  • A. The state's PASARR program must identify all individuals who are suspected of having MI or MR/RC as defined herein. The identification function and determination that NF criteria is met is termed Level I. Level II is the function of evaluating and determining whether NF placement is appropriate to meet the individual's MH/MR/RC needs and whether specialized services are needed.

    B. Evaluations performed under PASARR and PASARR notices must be adapted to the cultural background, language, ethnic origin, and means of communication used by the individual being evaluated. PASARR evaluations must involve the individual being evaluated, the individual's legal representative, if one has been designated under state law, and the individual's family if available and the individual or the legal representative agrees to family participation. When parts of a PASARR evaluation are performed by more than one evaluator, there must be interdisciplinary coordination among the evaluators.

    C. All information that is necessary for determining whether it is appropriate for the individual with MI or MR/RC to be placed in a NF or in another appropriate setting should be gathered throughout all applicable portions of the PASARR evaluation. The determinations relating to the need for NF level of care and specialized services are interrelated and must be based upon a comprehensive analysis of all data concerning the individual.

    D. Evaluators may use relevant evaluative data, obtained prior to initiation of preadmission screening or annual resident review, if the data are considered valid and accurate and reflect the current functional status of the individual. However, in the case of individualized evaluations, the PASARR program may need to gather additional information to supplement and verify the currency and accuracy of existing data and to assess proper placement and treatment.

    E. For individualized PASARR determinations, findings must be issued in the form of a written evaluative report which (i) identifies the name and professional title of person(s) who performed the evaluation(s) and the date on which each portion of the evaluation was administered; (ii) provides a summary of the medical and social history, including the positive traits or developmental strengths and weaknesses or developmental needs of the evaluated individual; (iii) if NF services are recommended, identifies the specific services which are required to meet the evaluated individual's needs; (iv) if specialized services are not recommended, identifies any specific MR/RC or MH services which are of a lesser intensity than specialized services that are required to meet the evaluated individual's needs; (v) if specialized services are recommended, identifies the specific MR/RC or MH services required to meet the evaluated individual's needs; and (vi) includes the basis for the report's conclusions.

    F. For categorical PASARR determinations, findings must be issued in the form of an abbreviated written evaluative report which (i) identifies the name and professional title of the person applying the categorical determination and the data on which the application was made; (ii) explains the categorical determination(s) that has (have) been made; (iii) identifies, to the extent possible, based on the available data, NF services, including any mental health or specialized psychiatric rehabilitative services, that may be needed; and (iv) includes the bases for the report's conclusions.

    G. For both categorical and individualized determinations, findings of the evaluation must correspond to the person's current functional status, mental health, and mental retardation status as documented in medical and social history records. Findings of the evaluation must be interpreted and explained to the individual and, where applicable, to a legal representative designed under state law by the assessment team or the MH/MRA. The evaluation report must be sent to the individual and his legal representative, appropriate state authority in sufficient time to meet the required time frames, admitting or retaining NF, individual's attending physician, and the discharging hospital if the individual is seeking NF admission from a hospital. The evaluation may be terminated at any time during the evaluation that the individual being evaluated does not have MI or MR/RC or has a primary diagnosis of dementia or a nonprimary diagnosis of dementia without a primary diagnosis that is a serious mental illness, and does not have a diagnosis of MR or a related condition.

Historical Notes

Derived from VR460-04-4.3910 § 7, eff. June 1, 1994.

Statutory Authority

§ 32.1-325 of the Code of Virginia.